[Repeater-Builder] Re: Wacom WP-641, correction on its specs...

2004-06-01 Thread nj902
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Neal Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually it depends on the Density of the Liquid material... > > Coy Hilton wrote: > > > It's like a 8 ounce glass, > >it doesn't matter what liquid you put into it, it still holds 8 > >ounces. > >73 > > AC0Y >

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wacom WP-641, correction on its specs...

2004-06-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Huh?? Original Message: - From: Coy Hilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 02:26:08 - To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wacom WP-641, correction on its specs... The Duplexer will provide a specified amount of isolation. It has

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wacom WP-641, correction on its specs...

2004-06-01 Thread Neal Newman
Actually it depends on the Density of the Liquid material... Coy Hilton wrote: > It's like a 8 ounce glass, >it doesn't matter what liquid you put into it, it still holds 8 >ounces. >73 > AC0Y > > > >--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "kerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>If you ar

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Wacom WP-641, correction on its specs...

2004-06-01 Thread Coy Hilton
The Duplexer will provide a specified amount of isolation. It has nothing to do with what you connect to it. It doesn't matter if it's a Spectrum transmitter of a GE MASTR II 110 watt with a PLL exciter. the amount of isolation remains the same. It's like a 8 ounce glass, it doesn't matter what

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wacom WP-641, correction on its specs...

2004-05-31 Thread Kevin Custer
Ron Stordahl N5IN wrote: >if all else fails I have a set of WP-639's which I could split, >2 cans on the 147.69 receive and two on the 144.39 packet. These are >bpbr cans but I had another use for them...maybe Ill have to use them. > That would be the best approach. We have a CAP repeater run

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wacom WP-641, correction on its specs...

2004-05-30 Thread Eric Lemmon
Ron, My suggestion wasn't really to tee both radios together, but to minimize interference between them if you used separate antennas that were relatively close to each other. To combine two systems into one antenna poses some significant challenges. Were this a commercial installation with the

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wacom WP-641, correction on its specs...

2004-05-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
avity ones for almost giveaway prices (and sometimes they are actually giving them away). LJ Original Message: - From: Ron Stordahl N5IN [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 17:37:45 - To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wacom WP-641, correcti

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Wacom WP-641, correction on its specs...

2004-05-30 Thread Steve S. Bosshard \(NU5D\)
Lloyd built a 2M RPTR / Packet Combiner using a 641 plus 2 additional 8" cavities. I have one similar in Rockdale, TX with a Fire Repeater, plus a 155.280 EMS simplex channel. Maybe TX/RX or John Elliot in Waco may have the plans. SSB Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Wacom WP-641, correction on its specs...

2004-05-30 Thread Ron Stordahl N5IN
1) Yes the intention is to put both 147.09tx/147.69rx and APRS packet 144.39 on the same antenna. 2) The WP-641 is spec'd for 500 KHz separation, and works very well at 600 KHz separation. The repeater is very sensitive, apparently little desense. It's a high power Micor cranked down to 75 w