RE: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Receiver site

2010-01-09 Thread John Szwarc
Of Kevin Custer Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 5:39 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Receiver site John Szwarc wrote: I'm looking for some advice on constructing a remote receiver site. Ideally I'd like to have everything contained in one neat

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Receiver site

2010-01-08 Thread Kevin Custer
John Szwarc wrote: I'm looking for some advice on constructing a remote receiver site. Ideally I'd like to have everything contained in one neat package just like at the repeater site. We'd be receiving on VHF and transmitting the link signal on UHF back to the repeater site.Any

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Receiver site

2010-01-08 Thread Mike DeWaele
-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of John Szwarc Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 10:26 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Receiver site I'm looking for some advice on constructing a remote receiver site

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Receiver site

2010-01-08 Thread James Adkins
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com *Subject:* [Repeater-Builder] Remote Receiver site I’m looking for some advice on constructing a remote receiver site. Ideally I’d like to have everything contained in one neat package just like at the repeater site. We’d be receiving on VHF and transmitting

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Receiver site

2010-01-08 Thread Oz-in-DFW
GE MVPs are the best answer I've found hands down. Swap a VHF RX in a UHF frame. You can use a MastrII or ExecII for the TX site and it's all very neat. Even cooler - MastrII RX and TX's convert to 220 pretty easily. While the conversion is not for the faint of heart, 220 links are cool. On

[Repeater-Builder] Remote Receiver site

2010-01-07 Thread John Szwarc
I'm looking for some advice on constructing a remote receiver site. Ideally I'd like to have everything contained in one neat package just like at the repeater site. We'd be receiving on VHF and transmitting the link signal on UHF back to the repeater site.Any thoughts?