Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-11-04 Thread Mark Holman
: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results On Monday 01 November 2004 01:07 pm, Bob Dengler wrote: Cushcraft 4-pole is far from a dummy load. It may be mechanically fragile, but it has about the same gain as any other comparable dipole array. I probably shouldn't have made

RE: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-11-01 Thread Tony lelieveld
Thanks Paul. Tony. * http://www.repeater-builder.com/antenna/wa6svt.html Paul N1BUG Yahoo! Groups Links --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date:

Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-11-01 Thread Bob Dengler
At 10/30/2004 12:18 PM, you wrote: Unfortunately I don't have much to compare its performance to. The previous antenna was a Cushcraft 4-pole dummy load at the same height. The coaxial collinear provides MUCH better coverage (no surprise there BIG grin). Then your collinear must be very good,

Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-11-01 Thread russ
-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:07 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results At 10/30/2004 12:18 PM, you wrote: Unfortunately I don't have much to compare its performance to. The previous antenna was a Cushcraft 4-pole dummy load at the same

Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-11-01 Thread Bob Dengler
At 11/1/2004 11:46 AM, you wrote: Here we go with gain again! A reminder that Crunchcraft rates every thing in DBc a made up gain. Not Dbd this is over a EIA 1/2 wave dipole. That statement may be true in regards to some of their other antennas, but is incorrect w.r.t. their omni dipole

Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-10-31 Thread Mike WA6ILQ
If Paul is amenable to it, I'll post his email as a web page indexed right under the original article. It will be a One person's results type of article (look at the 6m heliax duplexer article and it's One implementation of the above design) for an example of what I have in mind. And I agree -

RE: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-10-31 Thread Tony lelieveld
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results Hi Mike, Jeff, et al. You can use the email any way you like. I didn't take pictures during construction, but wish I had. I didn't anticipate the interest! I will be starting construction on another

Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-10-31 Thread Paul Kelley
On Sunday 31 October 2004 10:59 am, Tony lelieveld wrote: This sounds like a very interesting project. As I somehow missed the start of this thread please let me/us know what the original project plan is and where it came from. http://www.repeater-builder.com/antenna/wa6svt.html Paul

[Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-10-30 Thread Paul Kelley
Recently when I said I was building one of these, some folks wanted my evaluation of it when it was completed. I've misplaced your emails (I hate when that happens!) so will post it here and hope Kevin doesn't mind. I built a 10 element UHF version. One minor concern: I couldn't change the

Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-10-30 Thread Jeff Otterson
Hey Paul, How about posting some pictures somewhere so we can see your creation? Thanks, Jeff N1KDO At 04:18 PM 10/30/2004, you wrote: Recently when I said I was building one of these, some folks wanted my evaluation of it when it was completed. I've misplaced your emails (I