Re: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-17 Thread MCH
But the users at the control points transmit. In WPA, such links are coordinated for a particular radius in which the station is "coordinated". It helps assure that the receiver does not receive interference from other such links. Joe M. Kris Kirby wrote: > On Sat, 17 May 2008, Ron Wright wrot

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-17 Thread Ron Wright
Kris, I think the issue for aux stn is that there is a tx in the system and the rcvr is the designated end of the transmission. You are correct the receiver does not need coordination. The freq of the tx does not need coordination, but as with a repeater if it is coordinated it has interfe

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-17 Thread Paul Plack
ssage - From: Kris Kirby To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 4:59 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link On Sat, 17 May 2008, Ron Wright wrote: > §97.213 Telecommand of an amateur station. If radio, the control > lin

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-17 Thread Paul Plack
rs. 73, Paul, AE4KR - Original Message - From: Ralph Mowery To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 4:56 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link --- On Sat, 5/17/08, Mike Besemer (WM4B) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-17 Thread Kris Kirby
On Sat, 17 May 2008, Ron Wright wrote: > ??97.213 Telecommand of an amateur station. If radio, the control > link must use an auxiliary station. > > This says it all. A control link for controlling a repeater by radio > is an auxiliary station. Also in 97.201 the freq coordination for Aux

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-17 Thread Ron Wright
§97.213 Telecommand of an amateur station. If radio, the control link must use an auxiliary station. This says it all. A control link for controlling a repeater by radio is an auxiliary station. Also in 97.201 the freq coordination for Aux stations follows similar to repeaters. If int

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-17 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
, May 17, 2008 5:40 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link Mike, This may be one of those creative local interpretations embraced by some coordinators who wish to create a "gray area" after finding the black-and-white of the regs too con

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-17 Thread Paul Plack
B) To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 2:38 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link Help me out here guys. The following piece of information came from our coordinating body: To: Mike Besemer (WM4B) Subject: Re: Control Link/Repeater L

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-17 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Help me out here guys. The following piece of information came from our coordinating body: To: Mike Besemer (WM4B) Subject: Re: Control Link/Repeater Linking There is much confusion and disagreement between hams as to what is legal in part 97. If you search the SERA band plan you wil

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-16 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
. Also Ron my name is Collin. -Original Message- From: Ron Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:mccrpt%40verizon.net> > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> Sent: Fri, 16 May 2008 8:43 am Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Con

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-16 Thread Ron Wright
so I am sorry and apologize. Also Ron my name is Collin. -Original Message- From: Ron Wright < [EMAIL PROTECTED] net <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Fri, 16 May 2008 8:43 am Subject

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-16 Thread n4tua
Collin. -Original Message- From: Ron Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Fri, 16 May 2008 8:43 am Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link Collins, Well how stupid do you think Mike is??? :)  Your comment "No you are not too s

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-16 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link Collins, Well how stupid do you think Mike is??? :) Your comment "No you are not too stupid to do this" caught my eye, hi. Got my first laugh of the day. Seems I don't get those much anymore. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-16 Thread Ron Wright
Collins, Well how stupid do you think Mike is??? :) Your comment "No you are not too stupid to do this" caught my eye, hi. Got my first laugh of the day. Seems I don't get those much anymore. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater T

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-16 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:39 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link Mike, No you are not too stupid to do this. On my Basic controller it is called control

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Control Link

2008-05-15 Thread n4tua
Mike, No you are not too stupid to do this. On my Basic controller it is called control receiver. It is there only to control the repeater functions. It can be locked up under several layers of control access. In other words with one DTMF password you could access limited functions and with ano