RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT DTV

analogue is a recipe for failure To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com From: jsu...@intrastar.net Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:32:55 -0600 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT DTV I find it horribly inaccurate since it doesn’t take into account receiving

RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT DTV

I find it horribly inaccurate since it doesn’t take into account receiving height. What height are they calculating for? Set-top first-story height? Rooftop? Tower top? At the dirt? I know they didn’t compensate for the 20 ft altitude change between the end of my driveway and the front do

Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT DTV

At 07:02 2/20/2009, Chuck Kelsey wrote: > >I just checked this against my location and the >results were woefully inaccurate. I just checked this against my QTH and it was 95% accurate with respect to actual experience. > >Chuck >WB2EDV > > >- Original Message - >From:

Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT DTV

I had mixed results. It said I'd get stations that I can't and said I won't get stations that I do. Same thing for another location I checked. Chuck - Original Message - From: "Paul N1BUG" To: Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:39 AM Subject: Re: [Repeate

Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT DTV

Yup. Woefully inaccurate (too optimistic) for my location too, but after zooming all the way in I am impressed with their terrain data. :-) Chuck Kelsey wrote: >  > I just checked this against my location and the results were woefully > inaccurate. > > Chuck > WB2EDV > http://www.fcc.go

Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT DTV

I just checked this against my location and the results were woefully inaccurate. Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: Ralph S. Turk To: Repeater-Builder Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 9:19 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] OT DTV Good morning All The following is a