RE: [Repeater-Builder] Quantar Simulcast Issue

2010-06-24 Thread Jeff DePolo
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Quantar Simulcast Issue Well if the transmitters are running at the same frequency but at a different phase it is reasonable to expect that there would be some point where the 2 transmitters are at close to the same power level, but 180 degrees out of phase

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Quantar Simulcast Issue

2010-06-24 Thread Kevin Custer
Jeff DePolo wrote: To get the RF phase accuracy you're implying that is required would mean that everything in the RF path would have to guarantee that phase relationship. That means the same length RF interconnect cables inside the cabinet, same RF feedline length (or full-wavelength

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Quantar Simulcast Issue

2010-06-24 Thread Thomas Oliver
Thanks Kevin, Now I know the reason for the offset. tom On 6/24/2010 4:58 PM, Kevin Custer wrote: Jeff DePolo wrote: To get the RF phase accuracy you're implying that is required would mean that everything in the RF path would have to guarantee that phase relationship. That means the

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Quantar Simulcast Issue

2010-06-23 Thread DCFluX
Are the cables coming from the GPS reference are the same length at both sites? Also if these are VHF it could be that the reference frequency (channel spacing) is 5 kHz, if that is the case a harmonic of a paging tone might get past the audio pass band filtering 300 - 3000 Hz typically and is

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Quantar Simulcast Issue

2010-06-23 Thread Jeff DePolo
Are the cables coming from the GPS reference are the same length at both sites? Maybe I'm missing something here, but how the heck would the length of the cable from the reference oscillator to the transmitter/exciter matter? It's just the frequency reference (10 MHz or whatever) for the

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Quantar Simulcast Issue

2010-06-23 Thread DCFluX
Propagation delay in the coax. Get a dual trace oscilloscope and feed it with a 10 MHz GPS, off of a Tee and into 2 different lengths of coax. I could see the DC offset thing if the audio was coupled with a 1uF cap at one site and a 0.1uF at the other. Maybe I'm missing something here, but how

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Quantar Simulcast Issue

2010-06-23 Thread Matthew Kaufman
wmhpowell wrote: I'm looking for some Quantar engineering level help re: an interesting simulcast issue. I live in an area where I can hear several of high band our simulcast Quantars. The whole thing was installed and set up by Motorola including GPS stabilized time bases. I'm monitoring

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Quantar Simulcast Issue

2010-06-23 Thread Matthew Kaufman
DCFluX wrote: Are the cables coming from the GPS reference are the same length at both sites? This wouldn't matter at all. For frequency, it has no effect, and if the GPS 1pps is being used for audio phase this would just offset the phase as though the transmitter itself were moved by the

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Quantar Simulcast Issue

2010-06-23 Thread Jeff DePolo
Propagation delay in the coax. Propagation delay doesn't affect anything on the reference output side of the GPSDO. The phase of the reference oscillator can vary -- the synthesizer doesn't care about the phase of the reference oscillator, only the frequency. Likewise, the VCO output isn't

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Quantar Simulcast Issue

2010-06-23 Thread DCFluX
Well if the transmitters are running at the same frequency but at a different phase it is reasonable to expect that there would be some point where the 2 transmitters are at close to the same power level, but 180 degrees out of phase which should cancel out the receiver or at least make

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Quantar Simulcast Issue

2010-06-23 Thread Matthew Kaufman
DCFluX wrote: Well if the transmitters are running at the same frequency but at a different phase it is reasonable to expect that there would be some point where the 2 transmitters are at close to the same power level, but 180 degrees out of phase which should cancel out the receiver or at