I would agree the Sinclair Antennas are well built and
very broadband, but I had a horible time with a number
of 4 bay vhf broadband units installed (and removed)
in 2005. We bought a large number of VHF SLR-235
units new. The part number has changed but the antenna
is the same
I've always heard and seen good performance from Sinclair, except for
the SRL-222 and SRL-224. Those two were problematic.
Chuck
WB2EDV
Jeff DePolo WN3A wrote:
I would agree the Sinclair Antennas are well built and
very broadband, but I had a horible time with a number
of 4 bay vhf
Nope, the 235 is in the same family as the 210. The 210 family is a good
line.
The 222/224 does not have a boom that holds the element away from the
mast. Instead, the element is attached right at the mounting mast and
has some sort of funky hairpin type matching configuration.
Chuck
WB2EDV
The SRL235 series with its double dipoles side by side on each side of
the mast doesn't have any connection with the SRL210 series unless it is
in the way that the feedline is terminated at the element (the picture I
see in their catalogue looks like an internal termination like the 210
Yes, Burt, that's what I guess I was getting at -- the same style
element and enclosed harness attachment.
Chuck
WB2EDV
Burt Lang wrote:
The SRL235 series with its double dipoles side by side on each side of
the mast doesn't have any connection with the SRL210 series unless it is
in the
5 matches
Mail list logo
