Robin Midgett wrote:
> Isn't that what CTCSS is for??
No. That doesn't get rid of the interference, it just mutes your
speaker. But the signal is still there.
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater
Good point!
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robin Midgett
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:45 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT - funny interference story
Since when has Money
ither.
>
>Paul
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard
>Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 7:37 PM
>To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT - funny interfer
ECTED] Behalf Of Richard
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 7:37 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT - funny interference story
I just wonder if the guy was dumb enough to think he wouldn't get caught!
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Repeat
I just wonder if the guy was dumb enough to think he wouldn't get caught!
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave VanHorn
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:36 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-B
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Neil McKie wrote:
> I suppose an opera being fed to your service monitor on the
> wireless mic frequency would do wonders to the Karaoke folks ...
Or some choice movie clips...
"This is the police -- we have you surrounded, come out with your hands
up..."
And of course
Granted, but distant weak signals (in my experience) are the
exception on repeaters..not the rule. CTCSS on the input would have
kept the wireless mic(s) from getting through the repeater, until
someone keyed up the repeater with a valid signal. At that point, it
would have been a game of which
ubject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT - funny interference story
Isn't that what CTCSS is for??
At 11:43 AM 1/12/2006, you wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Not very funny when you have to waste hours of time
> > chasing these things down, knocking on doors &
> &
Isn't that what CTCSS is for??
At 11:43 AM 1/12/2006, you wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Not very funny when you have to waste hours of time
> > chasing these things down, knocking on doors &
> > explaining to total strangers that they have a
> > nuisance generator within their premises.
Especially when they are drunk.
I suppose an opera being fed to your service monitor on the
wireless mic frequency would do wonders to the Karaoke folks ...
Neil
skipp025 wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Not very funny when you have to waste hours of time
> > chasing these
Dave,
Believe me, it's true! Nothing came of it but it caused a lot of problems
for the Police while it was going on.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave VanHorn
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 12:36 PM
To: Repeater-B
Skipp,
American Idol at it's worst?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of skipp025
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 11:44 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT - funny interference story
A couple of years ago, I was in SF near the Height / Ashbury district and
had a Karaoke comming over my 220 radio. I listen for as long as I could
stand it and then changed to simplex and transmitted in a deep voice "This
is the devil, you are bothering me, stop singing" (followed by my call of
13 matches
Mail list logo