RE: [Repeater-Builder] WYGG (RF Radiation Hazard Warning Signs?)

2008-01-04 Thread Jeff DePolo
t was what was cited > in the NAL. > > > > Mark - N9WYS > > > > > > From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Guello > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 5:18 PM > To: Repeate

RE: [Repeater-Builder] WYGG (RF Radiation Hazard Warning Signs?)

2008-01-03 Thread N9WYS
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Guello Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 5:18 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] WYGG (RF Radiation Hazard Warning Signs?) The FCC data base lists their ERP as 1.5KW and antenna height as 26 meters AMSL. http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/fmq

RE: [Repeater-Builder] WYGG (RF Radiation Hazard Warning Signs?)

2008-01-03 Thread Paul Guello
The FCC data base lists their ERP as 1.5KW and antenna height as 26 meters AMSL. http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/fmq?list=0&facid=19867 n9wys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did some checking on station WYGG. 1) They are licensed for 100W; they were operating at 240

RE: [Repeater-Builder] WYGG (RF Radiation Hazard Warning Signs?)

2008-01-03 Thread n9wys
I did some checking on station WYGG. 1) They are licensed for 100W; they were operating at 240W. 2) They are licensed for an antenna height of 15 meters (~46 feet). They were operating at almost *3 times* that height (29.9 meters in excess). 3) They had no logs available; 4) There was no d