Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:58:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#578505: fixed in reportbug 4.12.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #578505,
regarding reportbug: raises "NameError: global name 'timeout' is not defined"
when selecting bug from filtered list
to be marked as d
Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:58:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#577986: fixed in reportbug 4.12.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #577986,
regarding too many values to unpack for conffiles
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:58:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#577986: fixed in reportbug 4.12.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #577986,
regarding too many values to unpack for conffiles
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:58:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#577986: fixed in reportbug 4.12.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #577986,
regarding too many values to unpack for conffiles
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:58:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#577986: fixed in reportbug 4.12.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #577986,
regarding too many values to unpack for conffiles
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:58:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#577986: fixed in reportbug 4.12.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #577986,
regarding too many values to unpack for conffiles
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Accepted:
python-reportbug_4.12.1_all.deb
to main/r/reportbug/python-reportbug_4.12.1_all.deb
reportbug_4.12.1.dsc
to main/r/reportbug/reportbug_4.12.1.dsc
reportbug_4.12.1.tar.bz2
to main/r/reportbug/reportbug_4.12.1.tar.bz2
reportbug_4.12.1_all.deb
to main/r/reportbug/reportbug_4.12.1_
Hello Bastian,
thanks for your email.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 22:43, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Hi reportbug team,
>
> are you still interested in porting reportbug to debbugs' SOAP interface
> for fetching bugreports?
Of course we are.
> I'd be still willing to help porting reportbug
> to python
Hi reportbug team,
are you still interested in porting reportbug to debbugs' SOAP interface
for fetching bugreports? I'd be still willing to help porting reportbug
to python-debianbts which runs like a charm for almost two years now for
reportbug-ng.
Just a short crashcourse into debianbts:
>>>
reportbug_4.12.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
reportbug_4.12.1.dsc
reportbug_4.12.1.tar.bz2
reportbug_4.12.1_all.deb
python-reportbug_4.12.1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
___
reportbug_4.12.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
reportbug_4.12.1.dsc
reportbug_4.12.1.tar.bz2
reportbug_4.12.1_all.deb
python-reportbug_4.12.1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
__
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 578505 pending
Bug #578505 [reportbug] reportbug: raises "NameError: global name 'timeout' is
not defined" when selecting bug from filtered list
Added tag(s) pending.
> tag 578505 pending
Bug #578505 [reportbug] reportbug: raises "NameError:
tag 578505 pending
tag 578505 pending
thanks
Date: Thu Apr 22 21:36:57 2010 +0200
Author: Sandro Tosi
Commit ID: 117d83e66ca7d68acaef25b3bac1e27ce4a1bf79
Commit URL:
http://git.debian.org/?p=reportbug/reportbug.git;a=commitdiff;h=117d83e66ca7d68acaef25b3bac1e27ce4a1bf79
Patch URL:
http://git.
> Thanks for the proposed patch. Anyhow, the right solution is to simply
> ignore that extra value in the module that parses them [..]
> conffiles = conffiles + [tuple(line.split()[:2])]
Nice. Thanks, Sandro.
--
___
Reportbug-maint mailing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 577986 pending
Bug #577986 [reportbug] too many values to unpack for conffiles
Bug #578124 [reportbug] too many values to unpack for conffiles
Bug #578296 [reportbug] too many values to unpack for conffiles
Bug #578702 [reportbug] too many val
tag 577986 pending
tag 577986 pending
thanks
Date: Thu Apr 22 19:33:58 2010 +0200
Author: Sandro Tosi
Commit ID: 2ad24947560a599805ce3ad55f5e560bb3d173a5
Commit URL:
http://git.debian.org/?p=reportbug/reportbug.git;a=commitdiff;h=2ad24947560a599805ce3ad55f5e560bb3d173a5
Patch URL:
http://git.
Hello Ilguiz,
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:10, Ilguiz Latypov wrote:
> I wonder if ignoring any extra information in conffiles records addresses the
> root cause properly. Here is the change I am suggesting.
>
> =
> --- /usr/share
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 578124 important
Bug #578124 [reportbug] too many values to unpack for conffiles
Bug #577986 [reportbug] too many values to unpack for conffiles
Bug #578296 [reportbug] too many values to unpack for conffiles
Bug #578702 [reportbug] too m
severity 578124 important
stop
Appears also when reporting bugs against many other packages (e.g.
eclipse, clamav-freshclam).
Therefore increasing severity to important.
Cheers,
Chris.
___
Reportbug-maint mailing list
Reportbug-maint@lists.alioth.deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 577986 578741
Bug#577986: Crash on the third step (after current bugs list)
Bug#578741: reportbug: does not play well with common-lisp-controller
Bug#578124: "ValueError: too many values to unpack" when running reportbug
Bug#578296: rep
forcemerge 577986 578741
retitle 577986 too many values to unpack for conffiles
thanks
Hi Luca,
the bug it's already reported (I've retitled it so it might be better
identifiable and we'll stop having duplicates)
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 13:25, Luca Capello wrote:
> Package: reportbug
> Version:
Package: reportbug
Version: 4.12
Severity: important
Hi there!
It seems that reportbug does not want to work with c-l-c:
=
l...@gismo:~$ reportbug --template common-lisp-controller
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 2082, in
main()
File "/usr/bin/repor
Come stai?
Dillo a voi una buona notizia, il mio amico ha trovato un buon sito,
sono principalmente prodotti elettronici, prezzi bassi, potrebbe essere
necessario. Tali macchine fotografiche, telefoni cellulari, console di gioco
PS3, LCD
Televisori, computer portatili, iPhone, auto m
23 matches
Mail list logo
