[Reportbug-maint] Bug#878088: reportbug: please inform security and lts teams about security update regressions

On 24-01-2018 19:37, Markus Koschany wrote: > Thanks. How do you catch the case when security updates are part of a > stable point release? This requires more effort. Does the package tracker offer a way to query such information? The only other idea I have right now involves inspecting the

[Reportbug-maint] Bug#888296: marked as done (reportbug: the gnome surface and all gui programs crash if an android read/write state changed or plugged in)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:56:01 -0500 with message-id and subject line Re: [Reportbug-maint] Bug#888296: reportbug: the gnome surface and all gui programs crash if an android read/write state changed or plugged in

[Reportbug-maint] Bug#888296: reportbug: the gnome surface and all gui programs crash if an android read/write state changed or plugged in

Package: reportbug Version: 7.1.8 Severity: normal -- Package-specific info: ** Environment settings: INTERFACE="text" ** /root/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version "7.1.8" mode advanced ui text realname "TheAnonDevil" email "theanonde...@protonmail.com" no-check-uid no-cc header "X-Debbugs-CC:

[Reportbug-maint] Bug#878088: reportbug: please inform security and lts teams about security update regressions

Am 24.01.2018 um 19:32 schrieb Nis Martensen: > How about this? > > import apt > > def is_security_update(pkgname, version): > try: > p = apt.Cache()[pkgname] > except: > return False > > if version not in p.versions: > return False > > if

[Reportbug-maint] Bug#878088: reportbug: please inform security and lts teams about security update regressions

How about this? import apt def is_security_update(pkgname, version): try: p = apt.Cache()[pkgname] except: return False if version not in p.versions: return False if 'Debian-Security' in [o.label for o in p.versions[version].origins]:

[Reportbug-maint] Bug#878088: reportbug: please inform security and lts teams about security update regressions

Am 24.01.2018 um 16:56 schrieb Nis Martensen: > Let me describe my suggestion in more detail: > > - Instead of having the "is this a security version" check > implemented directly in bin/reportbug as a version number check, there > could be a new function "is_security_update(package, version)"

[Reportbug-maint] Bug#878088: reportbug: please inform security and lts teams about security update regressions

Let me describe my suggestion in more detail: - Instead of having the "is this a security version" check implemented directly in bin/reportbug as a version number check, there could be a new function "is_security_update(package, version)" in reportbug/utils.py. You can move the version number

[Reportbug-maint] Bug#878088: Bug#878088: Bug#878088: reportbug: please inform security and lts teams about security update regressions

Please find attached the updated version of the patch. Now the patch checks for --offline mode and skips the section if this is true. The --timeout flag is honored and passed to requests. The listcc bug is fixed. It turned out that the email_address was a string and not a list anymore. The

[Reportbug-maint] Bug#888247: marked as done (reportbug: Reportbug does not report the correct used Shell)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:42:59 -0500 with message-id

[Reportbug-maint] Bug#878088: Bug#878088: Bug#878088: reportbug: please inform security and lts teams about security update regressions

Hello, Am 24.01.2018 um 01:16 schrieb Sandro Tosi: > sorry but did you even actually test your patch? this is the CC list: > > X-Debbugs-Cc: mo...@debian.org, t, e, a, m, @, s, e, c, u, r, i, t, y, > ., d, e, b, i, a, n, ., o, r, g > > this wont work i guess; just use listcc += as in the rest