uLWRlYmlhbmJ0cwpWZXJzaW9uOiAyLjUKU2V2ZXJpdHk6IGdyYXZlCgpIZWxsby
>> [etc etc etc]
>>
>> It still does.
>
> ok then, merging with the other bug against python-debianbts
>
--
Dr. Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de
Debian Develop
GUgeG1wcCBwbHVnaW4gKG5vciBoYXZlIGl0IGluc3RhbGxlZCkuLi4KCgpjaGVlcnMsCglIb2xnZXI=
>>
>
> Sounds similar to #799528.
>
Yep. Unfortunately the BTS encodes strings to base64 sometimes. I can
reproduce this issue as well as another UnicodeEncodeError wit
Sep 17, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As discussed a few weeks ago preparing the upload of the new
>> python-debianbts to unstable.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Bastian
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 27.08.2015 um 09:59 sc
Hi,
As discussed a few weeks ago preparing the upload of the new
python-debianbts to unstable.
Cheers,
Bastian
Am 27.08.2015 um 09:59 schrieb Bastian Venthur:
> Dear reportbug developers,
>
> developer of python-debianbts here. Someone was so kind to port
> python-debianb
e best way to test it
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> Dear reportbug developers,
>>
>> developer of python-debianbts here. Someone was so kind to port
>> python-debianbts away from SOAPpy to simplesoap. This will allow us to
>> tra
n the github repository?
Cheers,
Bastian
--
Dr. Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org
___
Reportbug-maint mailing list
Reportbug-
325222739.15355.53270.report...@debian.local>
source: reportbug
location: db-h
pending: done
found_date: []
originator: Jonathan Steel
blocks:
tags: []
date: 2010-03-25 22:30:02
mergedwith:
severity: normal
package: reportbug
summary:
log_modified: 2010-03-25 22:42:09
fixed_date: []
found_versions:
27;m wondering if the MUA
> handling could be split out of reportbug-ng and used in both
> reportbug-ng and reportbug. I would really like this because
> reportbug-ng supports my MUA (evolution), but reportbug does not and I
> have to go through a hacky procedure to get reportbug mails t
--
Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org
___
Reportbug-maint mailing list
Reportbug-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman
Bastian Venthur schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> just a quick question. Are the debianbts-python bindings supposed to go
> into an extra package, will we reuse python-debianbts or is it supposed
> to go into python-debian? Depending on the answer we can open or use the
> appropriate mail
ackage
first and lastaction: are dates
tags: ...
the "value" method helps to numerically sort bugreports, where open
bugreports have a higher value as closed ones and packages with a higher
severity have a higher number than bugreports with a lower one. One
could improve that by int
there the best is to start a new codebase, taking
> the useful bits from python-btsutils and from python-debianbts.
>
> I'm still willing to help on this process as much as my free time
> allows, but I wouldn't feel comfortable trying to do so
, 445287, 448852, 457045]
>>> status = debianbts.get_status(buglist)
>>> for i in status:
... print i
each status-object as attributes like, bugnumber, package, summary and
so on.
Cheers,
Bastian
--
Bastian Venthur http://vent
ut having to worry about tools which might break.
Cheers,
Bastian
--
Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org
___
Reportbug-maint mailing l
open to any
> package which turns to be the official way of interacting with BTS
> through python.
Sounds good to me.
Cheers,
Bastian
--
Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org
e the same
stuff under the hood. The question is how to achieve that. If we merge
the libs, we need to define a stable API which all of us can rely on and
the lib has to implement that. I need at least some kind of interface I
can rely on to query the BTS via SOAP.
Cheers,
Bastian
--
Bastian
16 matches
Mail list logo
