On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Olivier Berger
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Some more bits, trying to revive that thread maybe ;)
>
> Le vendredi 19 décembre 2008 à 15:01 +0100, Olivier Berger a écrit :
>> Hi.
>>
>> [I'm not sure I've thought about all this with sufficient care (and
>> surely didn't make eno
Em Qua, 2008-12-17 às 13:22 +0100, Bastian Venthur escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> just a quick question. Are the debianbts-python bindings supposed to go
> into an extra package, will we reuse python-debianbts or is it supposed
> to go into python-debian? Depending on the answer we can open or use the
> appr
n
plan, and likely from there the best is to start a new codebase, taking
the useful bits from python-btsutils and from python-debianbts.
I'm still willing to help on this process as much as my free time
allows, but I wouldn't feel comfortable trying to do so alone.
Kind regards,
Gus
s has some support
to html parsing as SOAP was somewhat in development/maturing when I
wrote it, but I don't think it's needed anymore.
--
Gustavo R. Montesino
http://grmontesino.blogspot.com
___
Reportbug-maint mailing list
Reportbug-maint@l
ld be the "oficial" one.
BTW, some time ago the python-debian guys have contacted me about adding
btsutils to their bundle, I suppose their offer would be open to any
package which turns to be the official way of interacting with BTS
through python.
--
Gustavo R. Montesino
http://grmonte
