I didn't try reportbug's unit tests, but I tested with reportbug-ng and
reportbug by *using* them with the new version of python-debianbts
installed. So far I didn't find any breakages. In contrast some bugs
have been fixed like the problem with the WNPP packages.
I didn't change the API (method
Hi,
As discussed a few weeks ago preparing the upload of the new
python-debianbts to unstable.
Cheers,
Bastian
Am 27.08.2015 um 09:59 schrieb Bastian Venthur:
> Dear reportbug developers,
>
> developer of python-debianbts here. Someone was so kind to port
> python-debianbts away from
did you test the package as described? do not delegate the testing to us alone
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed a few weeks ago preparing the upload of the new
> python-debianbts to unstable.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bastian
>
>
>
> Am
Done. I've just uploaded python-debianbts 2.0, which is based on
simplesoap to experimental. Please test the hell out of it. If I don't
hear any complaints within the next 2 weeks or so, I'll merge with
master and upload to unstable. The git branch for experimental is:
If you want, you can already run the unittests in reportbug: checkout
the source code and run make tests (there are not that many accessing
the bts, I'd be happy to expand them if you have any ideas how), else
I would just play a bit with reportbug --debug
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Bastian
Dear reportbug developers,
developer of python-debianbts here. Someone was so kind to port
python-debianbts away from SOAPpy to simplesoap. This will allow us to
transition python-debianbts to Python3 soon.
As far as I can see, the patch looks good and all unitttests run
smoothly, however since
I guess an upload to experimental is the best way to test it
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Bastian Venthur vent...@debian.org wrote:
Dear reportbug developers,
developer of python-debianbts here. Someone was so kind to port
python-debianbts away from SOAPpy to simplesoap. This will allow