Re: [Repoze-dev] [issue31] New blog backend

On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 14:02 +, Chris McDonough wrote: > Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > Tim Knapp (duffyd) volunteered to help set one up, so we'll go with whatever > he > eventually chooses (the only limitation I expressed was that it would be > WSGI). Yes, I'm

[Repoze-dev] [issue31] New blog backend

Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Tim Knapp (duffyd) volunteered to help set one up, so we'll go with whatever he eventually chooses (the only limitation I expressed was that it would be WSGI). Paul Everitt wrote: > Paul Everitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > W

[Repoze-dev] [issue31] New blog backend

Paul Everitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: We could get commenting with, probably, 2 hours of work on pyxblosxom. On the former, is Plone 3 enough? Martin Aspelli, for example, seems to have a decent-enough blog. I suspect that the repoze.org blog isn't something that we want to s

[Repoze-dev] [issue31] New blog backend

System message: -- assignedto: -> duffyd nosy: +duffyd __ Repoze Bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.