Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze grok comparison

2009/5/4 Hanno Schlichting : > Our gut feeling told us to either stick with a very-much known beast > like Zope 2.12 or go for repoze.bfg. Grok or the Zope Toolkit didn't > strike us as particular interesting with any of its offerings. I do have > a feeling that we might miss out some of the good f

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze grok comparison

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Iain Duncan wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 17:58 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote: >> It's only a small piece of Zope 3 or BFG, but a WebOb/Zope API >> comparison: http://pythonpaste.org/webob/differences.html#zope-3 >> I actually had to complain some to get a

[Repoze-dev] [issue72] Python 2.4 and profiler, broken with pyprof2calltree

Chris McDonough added the comment: I still use it with 2.4 (or at least I have in the past, not lately). It'd kinda suck to not be able to profile our old apps that require 2.4. __ Repoze Bugs __

Re: [Repoze-dev] [issue72] Python 2.4 and profiler, broken with pyprof2calltree

I still use it with 2.4 (or at least I have in the past, not lately). It'd kinda suck to not be able to profile our old apps that require 2.4. On 5/4/09 1:37 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > Hanno Schlichting added the comment: > > Since I added that particular dependency I should take care of th

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg on gae with zope.pagetemplate and helper routines

On 5/4/09 9:24 PM, Tim Hoffman wrote: > HI Chris > > Sounds like a plan > > I will start a repoze.bfg.gae > > My bindings for pagetemplate are pretty much the same, but I have a > higher level > wrapper that is doing some extra stuff for macros etc OK. > > So I may leave that zpt wrapper repo

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg on gae with zope.pagetemplate and helper routines

HI Chris Sounds like a plan I will start a repoze.bfg.gae My bindings for pagetemplate are pretty much the same, but I have a higher level wrapper that is doing some extra stuff for macros etc So I may leave that zpt wrapper repoze.bfg.gae as I plan to do some template caching that is suita

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg on gae with zope.pagetemplate and helper routines

Hi Tim, Carlos de la Guardia created zope.pagetemplate bindings for bfg the other day (http://svn.repoze.org/repoze.bfg.zopepagetemplate/trunk/). I might try to change that if it doesn't have what you need to get ZPT support, and then, if necessary, create another package that has the other hel

[Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg on gae with zope.pagetemplate and helper routines

Hi I am new to the list (and pretty new to repoze) I have put together a module which includes bindings for zope.pagetemplate with direct support for metal macros, plus a bunch of helper utils that make things a bit easier when using google app engine, I was thinking of calling it repoze.gae. A c

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze grok comparison

On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 17:45 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote: > Hey, > > Chris McDonough wrote: > > On 5/4/09 1:21 AM, Iain Duncan wrote: > >> Hi folks, I'm new here and was wondering if there is a good Repoze.bfg > >> to Grok comparison page anywhere. If not, I'd like to recommend that it > >> would

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze grok comparison

On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 17:58 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote: > It's only a small piece of Zope 3 or BFG, but a WebOb/Zope API > comparison: http://pythonpaste.org/webob/differences.html#zope-3 > I actually had to complain some to get a published reference doc for > Zope 3 request and response, which is to

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze grok comparison

Iain Duncan wrote: > Hi folks, I'm new here and was wondering if there is a good Repoze.bfg > to Grok comparison page anywhere. If not, I'd like to recommend that it > would be a great addition to the docs. I know there is a brief > comparison up there, but to someone like me who is experienced in

[Repoze-dev] [issue72] Python 2.4 and profiler, broken with pyprof2calltree

David Glick added the comment: pyprof2calltree depends on cProfile, which is only available in Python 2.5 and greater. If you really need to use it in Python 2.4, I've had some success building Python 2.5 and then manually copying cProfile.py and lib-dynload/_lsprof.so from the Python 2.5 libs

[Repoze-dev] [issue72] Python 2.4 and profiler, broken with pyprof2calltree

Hanno Schlichting added the comment: Since I added that particular dependency I should take care of this issue. Only question I have: Do we really still care about Python 2.4 support? Especially for profiling the 2.5 libraries are quite different and much better. Personally I'd just call 2.4

[Repoze-dev] [issue72] Python 2.4 and profiler, broken with pyprof2calltree

New submission from Jacob Singh : While repoze.profiler seems to be 2.4 compat with the try...except in the import, pyprof2calltree seems to not be. Here is the trace: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/solrflare/bin/gate2.py", line 129, in ? main() File "/usr/local/sol

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze grok comparison

Hey, Chris McDonough wrote: > On 5/4/09 1:21 AM, Iain Duncan wrote: >> Hi folks, I'm new here and was wondering if there is a good Repoze.bfg >> to Grok comparison page anywhere. If not, I'd like to recommend that it >> would be a great addition to the docs. I know there is a brief >> comparison u

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg trunk "C-free"

On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: > ... > I have no plans to chase a ZPT-on-GAE ball around the yard personally. But I > might go ahead and create BFG bindings for "plain old Genshi" (as opposed to > chameleon.genshi). Plain-old-Genshi seems to be supported on GAE

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg trunk "C-free"

Cool... I'll try to put whatever packages are required in the "dev" index and switch the GAE tutorial to using repoze.bfg.zopepagetemplate instead of repoze.bfg.jijna2. Martin gets his wish after all. ;-) - C On 5/4/09 2:46 AM, Carlos de la Guardia wrote: > Actually, Hanno was right. Using zo

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze grok comparison

On 5/4/09 1:21 AM, Iain Duncan wrote: > Hi folks, I'm new here and was wondering if there is a good Repoze.bfg > to Grok comparison page anywhere. If not, I'd like to recommend that it > would be a great addition to the docs. I know there is a brief > comparison up there, but to someone like me who

Re: [Repoze-dev] Separate 'compile' and 'execute' steps in Chameleon [was: Re: repoze.bfg trunk "C-free"]

Malthe Borch wrote: > 2009/5/4 Carlos de la Guardia : >> If Malthe or anyone else has a good idea about how to do this and will give >> me some pointers, I'm willing to use my limited abilities to make this work. >> Otherwise, I might try to bring in old zpt. > > It can be done, but it requires th

Re: [Repoze-dev] Separate 'compile' and 'execute' steps in Chameleon [was: Re: repoze.bfg trunk "C-free"]

2009/5/4 Carlos de la Guardia : > If Malthe or anyone else has a good idea about how to do this and will give > me some pointers, I'm willing to use my limited abilities to make this work. > Otherwise, I might try to bring in old zpt. It can be done, but it requires the introduction of a new compi