On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:32:32AM +0800, Tim Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Robert
>
> I am coming pretty late to your discussion about owrap, from what I have
> gleaned it does look interesting and potentially very
> useful for a project I am working on.
>
> From looking at the code and the dummyapp it lo
Hi Robert
I am coming pretty late to your discussion about owrap, from what I have
gleaned it does look interesting and potentially very
useful for a project I am working on.
>From looking at the code and the dummyapp it looks like its almost inverting
the relationship between a views template an
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:11:04PM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> I like this.
>
> Some variations:
>
> - Have IOWrap be a multiadapter on context and request, so we can vary the
> o-wrap based on request type too (e.g. "IManagementRequest" vs.
> "IRetailRequest").
Good idea. I'll go ahead an
2009/8/24 Chris McDonough :
> Malthe said it might be possible to register one or more new TAL expression
> types (each of which might represent a namespace) so templates could do
> something like tal:content="api:something" (note colon instead of dot) to get
> top-level names instead. The view wo
