Re: [Repoze-dev] chameleon.formish and formish i18n

2010-01-17 Thread Darryl Cousins
Hi Tom, On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Tom Gross wrote: > Hi all, > >  what is the preferred form generation tool for repoze.bfg? I tried > chameleon.formish, which seems a nice solution. > I found the fileupload-widget is broken, attached is a patch to fix it. > > This is probably the wrong li

[Repoze-dev] chameleon.formish and formish i18n

2010-01-17 Thread Tom Gross
Hi all, what is the preferred form generation tool for repoze.bfg? I tried chameleon.formish, which seems a nice solution. I found the fileupload-widget is broken, attached is a patch to fix it. This is probably the wrong list to ask about i18n support of formish, but since chameleon is inv

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.plone use with plone versions > 3.1?

2010-01-17 Thread Chris McDonough
Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:57 PM, ken manheimer > wrote: >> i'm getting the impression that you have a talent for understatement. :-) > > Yeah. People keep telling me that, no idea why :) > >> through a happy accident, a search through my inbox for "repoze" turned up

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.plone use with plone versions > 3.1?

2010-01-17 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote: >> There is something to consider: I suspect more things are started to >> require the new publisher events from Zope2, either directly or via one >> of the backport packages for Zope 2.10. I'm not sure if repoze.

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.plone use with plone versions > 3.1?

2010-01-17 Thread Chris McDonough
Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote: >> There is something to consider: I suspect more things are started to >> require the new publisher events from Zope2, either directly or via one >> of the backport packages for Zope 2.10. I'm not sure if repoze.

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.plone use with plone versions > 3.1?

2010-01-17 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:57 PM, ken manheimer wrote: > i'm getting the impression that you have a talent for understatement. :-) Yeah. People keep telling me that, no idea why :) > through a happy accident, a search through my inbox for "repoze" turned up > shane hathaway's february 2009 zope.

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.plone use with plone versions > 3.1?

2010-01-17 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > There is something to consider: I suspect more things are started to > require the new publisher events from Zope2, either directly or via one > of the backport packages for Zope 2.10. I'm not sure if repoze.zope2 > supports those. A "fo

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.plone use with plone versions > 3.1?

2010-01-17 Thread Wichert Akkerman
On 2010-1-17 07:33, Martin Aspeli wrote: > Hanno Schlichting wrote: > >> repoze.zope2 and .plone have been written largely by Agendaless for >> the KARL project. That project has gone through another iteration and >> nowadays uses repoze.bfg without any Plone instead. While there are >> some indivi