Re: [Repoze-dev] passing root_factory to a route in a hybrid BFG app?

On 4/12/10 6:02 PM, Iain Duncan wrote: > Thanks Chris. The offending examples are in: > > http://docs.repoze.org/bfg/1.2/narr/hybrid.html - Hybrid Applications - > Using *traverse in a Route Path. Thank you, this is now fixed. - C ___ Repoze-dev mailing

Re: [Repoze-dev] Using the multiprocessing module

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shane Hathaway wrote: > On 04/10/2010 07:00 AM, Andreas Jung wrote: >> is it save to use the 'multiprocessing' module inside a BFG app? >> In particular I need to maintain a multiprocessing.Pool() instance... >> this is working at the first glance howe

Re: [Repoze-dev] passing root_factory to a route in a hybrid BFG app?

Thanks Chris. The offending examples are in: http://docs.repoze.org/bfg/1.2/narr/hybrid.html - Hybrid Applications - Using *traverse in a Route Path. Iain On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: > The argument you want is "factory", not "root_factory" (see > http://docs.repoze.

Re: [Repoze-dev] passing root_factory to a route in a hybrid BFG app?

The argument you want is "factory", not "root_factory" (see http://docs.repoze.org/bfg/1.2/zcml/route.html#attributes). If you remember, can you point out where you got "root_factory" from so I can fix it in that spot? On 4/12/10 4:02 PM, Iain Duncan wrote: > Haven't heard anything back from m

Re: [Repoze-dev] Using the multiprocessing module

On 04/10/2010 07:00 AM, Andreas Jung wrote: > is it save to use the 'multiprocessing' module inside a BFG app? > In particular I need to maintain a multiprocessing.Pool() instance... > this is working at the first glance however the BFG app won't shutdown > in a clean way when stopped through a key

[Repoze-dev] passing root_factory to a route in a hybrid BFG app?

Haven't heard anything back from my 'maybe a bug' email, so I'm wondering if anyone is successfully passing alternate root_factory arguments to routes in zcml in hybrid bfg apps with BFG 1.2? Ie, is this a user error? thanks! Iain ___ Repoze-dev mailing

Re: [Repoze-dev] Repackaged PIL 1.1.7

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Withers wrote: > Hanno Schlichting wrote: >>> The confusion surrounding PIL almost makes me want to write some sort of >>> über >>> document listing the orginal problem along with all the various >>> hack-arounds. >> Both of these show you the

Re: [Repoze-dev] Problem with repoze.what-pylons sample application

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Phenex wrote: > Hi, > i am unable to run the sample application of the repoze.what pylons > integration. I get a bunch of error from paste i do not understant what went > went wrong. After i failed to get the new version to run (the old one hase > p