For maintaining an index for buildout projects, I find http://pypi.python.org/pypi/basketweaver
to be very easy to use.
Having said that, it probably depends on the following conditions:
1) You have access to a remote server which is likely to be available
for at least the length of time the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
> I know Chris is keen to run from indexes per projects, such as:
>
> http://dist.repoze.org/bfg/current/simple
>
> ..so I was wondering what people recommend, software wise, for
> maintaining such an index per project?
$ /pa
Hi Again,
Have any patterns emerged for using a BFG-ish configuration, transaction
and data stack to perform batch jobs triggered by cron?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_
Hi All,
I know Chris is keen to run from indexes per projects, such as:
http://dist.repoze.org/bfg/current/simple
..so I was wondering what people recommend, software wise, for
maintaining such an index per project?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python
On 21/04/10 22:22, Gustavo Narea wrote:
> > def see_you_later(self):
> > """Post-logout"""
> > notificator('We hope to see you soon!')
> > came_from = str(request.params.get('came_from', '')) or
> > url_for('/')
> > redirect_to(url_for(came_from))
>
According
Hi, Ian.
On 20/04/10 15:40, Ian Stevens wrote:
> Thanks Gustavo. The version of FriendlyForm I'm using, 1.0.4, does not
> implement IAuthenticator. I get the following error:
>
> ValueError: form: An object has failed to implement interface
>
> The authenticate attribute was not pro
Hi All,
The attached buildout should generate a versions.cfg file suitable for
running a particular version of BFG in a buildout.
I've attached its output for version 1.2, and the current development
index as of writing.
Could anyone who knows please check that it has picked the right versi
Charlie Clark wrote:
> Am 21.04.2010, 16:51 Uhr, schrieb Chris Withers :
>
>> But the above will definitely be in 1.3, right?
>
> Nice of you to offer to do the work! ;-)
Sorry, my comment was unclear, it was about the Venusian work, which is
done already.
i18n is hard, and who would need that
On 4/21/10 10:51 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
>>> Monkeypatchable or should I avoid trying to do that...
>>
>> The trunk now uses "venusian" instead of hardcoded decorator scanning.
>> See the repoze.bfg.view.bfg_view class for an example decorator that
>> registers a callback
Am 21.04.2010, 16:51 Uhr, schrieb Chris Withers :
> But the above will definitely be in 1.3, right?
Nice of you to offer to do the work! ;-)
Charlie
--
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting & Research
German Office
Helmholtzstr. 20
Düsseldorf
D- 40215
Tel: +49-211-600-3657
Mobile: +4
Chris McDonough wrote:
>> Monkeypatchable or should I avoid trying to do that...
>
> The trunk now uses "venusian" instead of hardcoded decorator scanning.
> See the repoze.bfg.view.bfg_view class for an example decorator that
> registers a callback that will be called at config.scan() time. S
On 4/21/10 11:23 , Chris McDonough wrote:
> The spelling:
>
>
>
> Is syntactic candy that can also be spelled like this:
>
>
>
>
> So you can probably do this:
>
>
>
> wrapper="some-other-view"/>
> name="some-other-view"/>
>
> I haven't tried this, but I
The spelling:
Is syntactic candy that can also be spelled like this:
So you can probably do this:
I haven't tried this, but I'm pretty sure it will work.
On 4/21/10 2:05 AM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> Is there any chance of having wrapped views work on views declared with
On 4/20/10 11:54 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> Hi folks, I noticed that in the new version of the BFGAlchemy sample
> app, the transaction manager is used to clear out the session after the
> transaction is done. I'm wondering whether there is anything wrong with
> cleaning the session by call Session.r
14 matches
Mail list logo
