Re: [Repoze-dev] Repoze with mod_wsgi and Varnish/Squid

2008-03-13 Thread Martin Aspeli
Paul Everitt wrote: > > Hi Martin, sounds cool about giving Repoze/Deliverance/Plone 3.1 a shot > this weekend. > > Regarding the point below, is the issue that you want static Deliverance > stuff served from a different URL? More than that - the server has SVN, Trac and a few other things on

Re: [Repoze-dev] Repoze with mod_wsgi and Varnish/Squid

2008-03-13 Thread Paul Everitt
Hi Martin, sounds cool about giving Repoze/Deliverance/Plone 3.1 a shot this weekend. Regarding the point below, is the issue that you want static Deliverance stuff served from a different URL? --Paul On Mar 12, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi, I'm what the best practice wou

Re: [Repoze-dev] Repoze with mod_wsgi and Varnish/Squid

2008-03-13 Thread Chris Withers
Chris McDonough wrote: > - Run two Apache instances: > > Apache (80) > | > | mod_proxy > v > Varnish () > | > | http > v > Apache (mod_wsgi)

Re: [Repoze-dev] Repoze with mod_wsgi and Varnish/Squid

2008-03-12 Thread Chris McDonough
Martin Aspeli wrote: > Hi, > > I'm what the best practice would be for running a site with Repoze and > Deliverance under mod_wsgi, with Varnish as a web cache. > > The only way I can think to make it work would be to use Varnish on port > 80, proxying Apache on some different port, with Repoze

[Repoze-dev] Repoze with mod_wsgi and Varnish/Squid

2008-03-12 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi, I'm what the best practice would be for running a site with Repoze and Deliverance under mod_wsgi, with Varnish as a web cache. The only way I can think to make it work would be to use Varnish on port 80, proxying Apache on some different port, with Repoze under mod_wsgi. I'm sure that'd w