Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg and gae

2010-04-22 Thread Davide Moro
Il giorno gio, 22/04/2010 alle 22.05 +0800, Tim Hoffman ha scritto: > HI Davide > > The comment re: zcml is more about startup performance. zcml works > fine its just slower and harder to > remove extraneous stuff. > > I am using request.params.get/request.POST with no problems. > > Note in the

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg and gae

2010-04-22 Thread Tim Hoffman
HI Davide The comment re: zcml is more about startup performance. zcml works fine its just slower and harder to remove extraneous stuff. I am using request.params.get/request.POST with no problems. Note in the debugger in gae you will need to use p to output values as in (Pdb) p request Oth

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg and gae

2010-04-22 Thread Davide Moro
Il giorno gio, 22/04/2010 alle 20.45 +0800, Tim Hoffman ha scritto: > Hi Davide > > No refactoring is required that I have found to date. You just can't > use zodb etc > so you need to use appengines models. So you are using the > view/traversal/routes/events parts of > bfg. I would also sug

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg and gae

2010-04-22 Thread Tim Hoffman
Hi Davide No refactoring is required that I have found to date. You just can't use zodb etc so you need to use appengines models. So you are using the view/traversal/routes/events parts of bfg. I would also suggest you declare views using python rather than using zcml. T On Thu, Apr 22, 20

[Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg and gae

2010-04-22 Thread Davide Moro
Hi, I have a question about repoze.bfg that runs on Google App Engine, hope this is the right list. Does a bfg's callable view code need to be refactored when our application runs on GAE? I mean, for example it is possible to getting data from the params attribute of the webob request or we need t