On Wednesday September 17, 2008 19:32:52 Gustavo Narea wrote:
> I'm going to start the migration
> of development-related stuff from Launchpad
This is, the blueprints for the plugin (there are no open bugs) and the code
itself.
--
Gustavo Narea.
http://gustavonarea.net/
Get rid of unethical con
Hello,
I'd be glad to contribute it to the Repoze core -- I actually suggested that
in a early stage of the development of the plugin.
I've just signed and sent the contributor's agreement.
I'll be offline until Friday, so on Saturday I'm going to start the migration
of development-related stu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Pratt wrote:
> Hi Gustavo. An LDAP package is a useful and interesting addition to
> who. Unfortunately, the licensing choice is not compatible with
> repoze and I could not use it as a result.
Correction: the license we are using[1] is a
The ZPL is compatible with the GPL, by specific intent. I know,
because ZC's board chairman and I were the ones that spent the lawyer
money and negotiated with the FSF to make it happen.
The other points about whether Zope and Plone and who got mad at whom,
when, and what agendas each pa
Hi Gustavo. An LDAP package is a useful and interesting addition to
who. Unfortunately, the licensing choice is not compatible with
repoze and I could not use it as a result. In reality, I don't
believe it is productive to extend the same licensing game (to
repoze) that has plaqued zope
Thank you Gustavo, looks good!
Gustavo Narea wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> The first release candidate for version 1 of the LDAP plugin for repoze.who
> is
> out!
>
> It provides an easy-to-use LDAP authenticator that is compatible with any
> identifier that defines the 'login' and 'password'
Hello, everyone.
The first release candidate for version 1 of the LDAP plugin for repoze.who is
out!
It provides an easy-to-use LDAP authenticator that is compatible with any
identifier that defines the 'login' and 'password' items in the identity
dictionary, like the FormPlugin and Redirectin
