Re: [Repoze-dev] Identifier plugins...

2009-06-17 Thread Chris McDonough
r.who 1.0.14 released with a fix like this. - C On 6/17/09 3:10 PM, Gustavo Narea wrote: > Chris said: >> How did I miss this? This is a pretty good interim idea; thanks Gustavo. >> I'll try to merge it in with the current state of affairs. > > Cool ;-) > > Cheers, ___

Re: [Repoze-dev] Identifier plugins...

2009-06-17 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Douglas Mayle wrote: > I've been doing some testing of a new site, and I've used repoze.who > and repoze.what for authentication, and authorization respectively.  I > did notice one unusual behavior with AuthTktCookiePlugin, however.  If > I log in to the site, I re

Re: [Repoze-dev] Identifier plugins...

2009-06-17 Thread Gustavo Narea
Chris said: > How did I miss this? This is a pretty good interim idea; thanks Gustavo. > I'll try to merge it in with the current state of affairs. Cool ;-) Cheers, -- Gustavo Narea . | Tech blog: =Gustavo/(+blog)/tech ~ About me: =Gustavo/about |

Re: [Repoze-dev] Identifier plugins...

2009-06-17 Thread Chris McDonough
On 6/17/09 3:00 PM, Gustavo Narea wrote: > Hello, > > Chris said: >> This is a design bug that may be a security issue; I will try to fix it in >> the next major release of r.who. > > What about this > http://lists.repoze.org/pipermail/repoze-dev/2009-February/001263.html ? > > Cheers, How did I

Re: [Repoze-dev] Identifier plugins...

2009-06-17 Thread Gustavo Narea
Hello, Chris said: > This is a design bug that may be a security issue; I will try to fix it in > the next major release of r.who. What about this http://lists.repoze.org/pipermail/repoze-dev/2009-February/001263.html ? Cheers, -- Gustavo Narea . | Tech blog: =Gustavo/(+blog)/tech ~ About me

Re: [Repoze-dev] Identifier plugins...

2009-06-17 Thread Chris McDonough
On 6/17/09 2:52 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Douglas Mayle wrote: >> I've been doing some testing of a new site, and I've used repoze.who >> and repoze.what for authentication, and authorization respectively. I >> did notice one unusual behavior with AuthTktCook