FC Stegerman wrote:
> You're passing --version as a non-option argument:
>
> diffoscope -- --version
>
> It worked (and was probably needed) before as the "--" was interpreted
> by schroot, not diffoscope.
Oh, bravo :)
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@deb
* Holger Levsen [2023-09-05 16:39]:
> [13:16] < h01ger> https://deb.li/3jDcj / 4f9ccd0 is quite straighforward, so
> I'd appreciate a 2nd look :)
You're passing --version as a non-option argument:
diffoscope -- --version
It worked (and was probably needed) before as the "--" was interprete
Holger Levsen wrote:
> [13:16] < h01ger> https://deb.li/3jDcj / 4f9ccd0 is quite
> straighforward, so I'd appreciate a 2nd look :)
I would guess it's some quoting issue that's cutting off the argument
prematurely; diffoscope's command-line argument parsing is involved,
but it's not especially we
hi,
Debian CI builds should be "fully" back now. Will see if the main node
handles this better...
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
:wq
signature.asc
Description:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 09:51:47AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I've implemented & deployed this now. Hoping not to see very high loads again
> soon...
[11:58] < h01ger> debian CI builders are back
[13:15] < h01ger> though it doesnt work:
[13:15] < h01ger> bin/reproducible_build.sh update_jdn.sh
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 12:59:45PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> My next attempt will be to run diffoscope from bookworm, instead of running
> diffoscope from sid in a schroot.
I've implemented & deployed this now. Hoping not to see very high loads again
soon...
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾
