Re: Please review the draft for March's report

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If possible, please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-03/ .. and also consider retweeting: https://twitter.

Please review the draft for March's report

Hi all, Sorry for the delay in getting this out — it was, quite genuinely, a bumper amount of things that needed condensing, rewriting and generally getting into readable shape. Anyway, if folks would be so kind as to review the draft for last months report here: https://reproducible-builds.org

Re: Please review the draft for March's report

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If possible, please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-03/ .. and also consider retweeting: https://twitter.

Please review the draft for March's report

Hi all, Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-03/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2023-03.md I intend to publish it no

Re: Please review the draft for March's report

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If possible, please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-03/ .. and also consider retweeting: https://twitter.c

Please review the draft for March's report

Hi all, Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-03/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2022-03.md I plan to publish it no ear

Re: Please review the draft for March's report

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed. Please share the following URL: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-03/ And, if you are into that kind of thing, please consider retwee

Please review the draft for March's report

Hi all, Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-03/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2021-03.md I intend to publish it no

Re: Please review the draft for March's report

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed. Please share the following URL: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-03/ Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, please cons

Please review the draft for March's report

Hi all, Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-03/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2020-03.md I intend to publish it no e