Source: bespin
Version: 0.r1552+nmu1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Hi!
While working on Debian's “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have
noticed that bespin doesn't build reproducibly.
PNG images generated during the build
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Suggested solution:
>
> find foo -print0 | LC_ALL=C sort -z |
> tar --null -T - --no-recursion -Jcvf foo.tar.xz
Seems ideal to me.
> > (I thought this problem would be quite common, so I could add it to the
> > Wiki FAQ).
>
> It's there already:
> https://wiki
Source: palo
Version: 1.95
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps hostname username
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that palo could n
Source: p3scan
Version: 2:2.3.2-8.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that p3scan could not be b
Steven Chamberlain:
> Finally I ended up with this:
>
> $ find foo/ -type f -print0 > filelist
> $ tar -Jcvf foo.tar.xz -T filelist --null
>
> Does that seem like the neatest way, or do you have better suggestions?
You are missing the actual sorting on this one. ;)
Suggested solution:
find
Source: djview4
Version: 4.10-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that djview4 could not be buil
Source: tkrat
Version: 1:2.2cvs20100105-true-dfsg-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that tkrat
Source: harden-doc
Version: 3.17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that harden-doc could not be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Steven,
On 02/14/2015 09:44 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> What would be a preferred way to build a tar archive with deterministic
> file order?
>
> Firstly let me point out that:
>
> $ find foo/ -type f -print0 | sort -z | xargs -0 tar -cvf f
Hi,
The reproducible.d.n Jenkins jobs revealed a file ordering issue when we
construct kfreebsd-source-10.1.tar.xz from src:kfreebsd-10 this way:
tar cfJ $(SOURCE_PACKAGE)/usr/src/$(SRC_TAR) $(SRC_DIR)
What would be a preferred way to build a tar archive with deterministic
file order?
F
Hi,
Quoting Helmut Grohne (2015-02-14 21:14:41)
> A limitation of rebootstrap currently is that it can only output a build log.
> Thus I embed the debbindiffs into the log. This is cumbersome to read, since
> they are unrendered html. Having a plain text output mode would make reading
> these logs
Mattia Rizzolo:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > I'm not sure this did what you wanted. Quoting
> > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#fixed
> >
> > This does not cause the bug to be marked as closed, it merely adds
> > another version in which the bug
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> I'm not sure this did what you wanted. Quoting
> https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#fixed
>
> This does not cause the bug to be marked as closed, it merely adds
> another version in which the bug was fixed. Use the bugnumber
Package: debbindiff
Version: 8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
A limitation of rebootstrap currently is that it can only output a build
log. Thus I embed the debbindiffs into the log. This is cumbersome to
read, since they are unrendered html. Having a
Source: fedmsg
Version: 0.9.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that fedmsg could not be built
Debian Bug Tracking System:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > fixed 765301 0.004-1
> […]
I'm not sure this did what you wanted. Quoting
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#fixed
This does not cause the bug to be marked as closed, it merely adds
another ver
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 765301
Bug #765301 [strip-nondeterminism] strip-nondeterminism: treat .war and .hpi
files as jars
Marked Bug as done
> close 765302
Bug #765302 [strip-nondeterminism] strip-nondeterminism: strip
non-deterministic information from MANIFEST.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 765301 0.004-1
Bug #765301 [strip-nondeterminism] strip-nondeterminism: treat .war and .hpi
files as jars
There is no source info for the package 'strip-nondeterminism' at version
'0.004-1' with architecture ''
Unable to make a source vers
Chris Lamb:
> commit da146535f5d8af3e9b5685dbf597a9f4666ec1c1
> Author: Chris Lamb
> Date: Sat Feb 14 11:06:47 2015 +
>
> debbindiff.py: simplify exit code calculation
> ---
> debbindiff.py | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/debbindiff.py b/deb
Prompted by the announcement of reproducible builds status, I took a
look at a few of my packages and started testing with sbuild... which
apparently needs a few patches to get reproducible builds working...
I've got a couple brief proof-of-concept patches.
One patch sets the build dir to a stati
20 matches
Mail list logo
