[Reproducible-builds] dpkg 1.18.3.0~reproducible1 is broken (?)

2015-09-29 Thread Santiago Vila
Hi. Using deb http://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/ ./ even the most simple package created makes lintian to complain: apt-get -b source base-files lintian base-files_9.4_amd64.deb Skipping base-files_9.4_amd64.deb: syntax error at line 19: Duplicate field package. $ ar x

Re: [Reproducible-builds] libibatis-java changed in testing: reproducible -> FTBFS

2015-09-29 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:05:15PM +, Reproducible builds folks wrote: > More information on > https://reproducible.debian.net/testing/amd64/libibatis-java, feel free to > reply to this email to get more help. Hi folks, Thank you very much for your helpful periodic email reports about

[Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails

2015-09-29 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 29.09.2015 um 16:00 schrieb Miguel Landaeta: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:05:15PM +, Reproducible builds folks wrote: >> More information on >> https://reproducible.debian.net/testing/amd64/libibatis-java, feel free to >> reply to this email to get more help. > > Hi folks, > > Thank you

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails

2015-09-29 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 29/09/2015 16:32, Markus Koschany a écrit : > I would like to take the opportunity to raise the following concern. I > support the reproducible builds effort but I think the periodic e-mails > to pkg-java are often not useful enough at the moment. There are far too > many false-positives. The

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails

2015-09-29 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, thanks for explaining, Emmanuel! On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Actually I tend to prefer the reports in unstable. The reports in > testing are often duplicates of issues already known in unstable, and > sometimes they are already fixed in unstable when they are

Re: [Reproducible-builds] libibatis-java changed in testing: reproducible -> FTBFS

2015-09-29 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:00:30AM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:05:15PM +, Reproducible builds folks wrote: > > More information on > > https://reproducible.debian.net/testing/amd64/libibatis-java, feel free to > > reply to this email to get more help. > > Hi

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails

2015-09-29 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Markus Koschany wrote: > I would like to take the opportunity to raise the following concern. I > support the reproducible builds effort but I think the periodic e-mails > to pkg-java are often not useful enough at the moment. There are far too > many

Re: [Reproducible-builds] dpkg 1.18.3.0~reproducible1 is broken (?)

2015-09-29 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Santiago Vila: > Using > > deb http://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/ ./ > > even the most simple package created makes lintian to complain: > […] I will not be able to look into this at least before the week-end. So please beat me to it. -- Lunar.''`.

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails

2015-09-29 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 29/09/2015 17:08, Holger Levsen a écrit : > I agree and am wondering if we should actually do this, and limit > (maintainer) > notifications to unstable? What do you think? Well, if I understood your "this graph is a lie" properly in your talks, I think the reproducibility in testing isn't