[Reproducible-builds] Bug#819767: libtool: please make the build reproducible (timestamps, fileordering, hostname, umask)

Source: libtool Version: 2.4.6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps fileordering hostname umask X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#819726: ckbuilder: please use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for copyright notices and build timestamp

Package: ckbuilder Version: 2.3.0+dfsg-2 Severity: normal User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: toolchain timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that ckbuilder embeds the build time in two places: copyrigh headers on the built

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Best approach to strip timestamp in postscript files

Hi. Le 31/03/2016 18:35, Dhole a écrit : > And I think it would be very helpful if you work on that :) (and also in > implementing SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH in graphicsmagick if there is the same > issue there). I prepared [1] patches for imagemagick and transfig which make reproducibility issues with

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#819714: nifti2dicom: FTBFS: No rule to make target '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libproj.so'

Source: nifti2dicom Version: 0.4.11-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, nifti2dicom fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: