Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#822701: samtools: FTBFS: UNEXPECTED PASS: Task worked when we expected failure;

clone 822701 -2 reassign -2 htslib retitle -2 htslib 1.3.1 breaks samtools 1.3, at least at build time. retitle 822701 samtools 1.3 fails to build against htslib 1.3.1. tag 822701 +pending Le Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:02:28PM +0100, Chris Lamb a écrit : > Source: samtools > Version: 1.3-1 > Severity

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#822723: basex: FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.basex:basex:jar:8.2.3: Cannot access basex (http://files.basex.org/maven) in offline mode

Source: basex Version: 8.2.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, basex fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..] Ad

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#822702: ruby-crb-blast: FTBFS: Failure: test: crb-blast should get number of reciprocals. (TestCRBBlast)

Source: ruby-crb-blast Version: 0.6.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, ruby-crb-blast fails to build from source in unstable/am

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#822701: samtools: FTBFS: UNEXPECTED PASS: Task worked when we expected failure;

Source: samtools Version: 1.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, samtools fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#822700: golang-github-spf13-viper: FTBFS: inotify.go:19:2: cannot find package "golang.org/x/sys/unix"

Source: golang-github-spf13-viper Version: 0.0~git20160111.0.a212099-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, golang-github-spf13-viper

[Reproducible-builds] diffoscope 52 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the diffoscope source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 51 Current version: 52 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later

[Reproducible-builds] diffoscope_52~bpo8+1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:diffoscope is NEW. source:diffoscope is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely proc

[Reproducible-builds] Processing of diffoscope_52~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

diffoscope_52~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: diffoscope_52~bpo8+1.dsc diffoscope_52~bpo8+1.tar.xz diffoscope_52~bpo8+1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

[Reproducible-builds] Processing of diffoscope_52~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

diffoscope_52~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: diffoscope_52~bpo8+1.dsc diffoscope_52~bpo8+1.tar.xz diffoscope_52~bpo8+1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) ___

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#735377: 3.0 (native) silently ignores many binary files by default.

Hi, On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:54:15AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > That's weird, it does work fine here, just checked with git master to > make sure there's been no regressions: we've been seeing the same behavior when uploading diffoscope. When I build it, tests/data/test(1|2).(o|a) are not pa