Hello,
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 07:58:39AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Do you know of any restrictions on reading and writing files on your
> > cluster?
>
> no. Also: our amd64 and i386 setup are pretty much identical…
>
> > I'm pretty sure that the test suite only tries to read and
> >
Source: cl-babel
Version: 0.3.0+20091229-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
cl-babel fails to build from source in
Source: rapache
Version: 1.2.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
rapache fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
[..]
Source: c++-annotations
Version: 10.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
c++-annotations fails to build from source in
Hi Sean,
thanks for caring about reproducible builds and reaching out to us!
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 07:12:32PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> My package ocrmypdf builds reproducibly on my machine. But it fails to
> build at all on the reproducible-builds.org cluster.
that's actually not quite
Hi,
binutils 2.25-6 (which is long in testing + sid) made the build
reproducible (#774429). In that course that bug was cloned into #781262,
which asks for the ar handler of strip-nondeterminism to be removed.
I'm slightly confused now, but (why) is binutils the only package
benefitting from
