Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Guillem, On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:58:42AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Ok, so tar 1.29 has just been released and uploaded to Debian. I've > reworked the patch as mentioned above, and will merge it for 1.18.8, > and will do the same for most of the others. awesome news! looking much

Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 10:34:08 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 12:26:13 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > b.) common build timestamp for all files created at a later time > > Pending release of new upstream tar. And the patch reworked to stop > trying to detect the presence

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824592: twitter-bootstrap: wrong copyright formatting when using bash

2016-05-17 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Source: twitter-bootstrap Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-9 Severity: minor Tags: patch upstream User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: environment X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#824182: codeblocks: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-05-17 Thread Fabian Wolff
> So everything may be fine. If that's the case, sorry for the noise. (Then it > would be nice to add a comment explaining this, for future readers.) No, I think you are right: If SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is not set, then this is not going to work. I have tested the patch, but apparently only in an

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824587: stapler: FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.kohsuke.stapler:stapler:jar

2016-05-17 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: stapler Version: 1.242-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, stapler fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824584: libetonyek: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (mdds) were not met

2016-05-17 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: libetonyek Version: 0.1.6-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, libetonyek fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824585: libgnomekbd: FTBFS: find: 'doc': No such file or directory

2016-05-17 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: libgnomekbd Version: 3.6.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, libgnomekbd fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824586: networkmanager-qt: FTBFS: dh_makeshlibs: failing due to earlier errors

2016-05-17 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: networkmanager-qt Version: 5.16.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, networkmanager-qt fails to build from source in

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824182: Info received ( Bug#824182: codeblocks: please make the build reproducible (timestamps))

2016-05-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#824182: codeblocks: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-05-17 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > (sorry for repost, making sure the right people see this) > > Fabian Wolff: >> -export DEB_CPPFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND=-DNDEBUG >> +export DEB_CPPFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND=-DNDEBUG \ >> +-DBUILD_DATE="\"\\\"`date -u -d @$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH) +%Y-%m-%d`\\\"\"" >> \ >> +

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#824182: codeblocks: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-05-17 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 07:01:49PM +0200, Ximin Luo wrote: > export SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH = $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog -SDate | date -f- +%s) s/=/?=/ might be also nicer, IMHO. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#824182: codeblocks: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-05-17 Thread Ximin Luo
(sorry for repost, making sure the right people see this) Fabian Wolff: > -export DEB_CPPFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND=-DNDEBUG > +export DEB_CPPFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND=-DNDEBUG \ > + -DBUILD_DATE="\"\\\"`date -u -d @$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH) +%Y-%m-%d`\\\"\"" > \ > + -DBUILD_TIME="\"\\\"`date -u -d

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Tails-dev] tails binary and source packages lists URL has changed…

2016-05-17 Thread intrigeri
Hi Holger, Holger Levsen wrote (17 May 2016 11:29:56 GMT) : > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 01:16:28PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: >> I'm working on it and hope to fix it today. Repaired! > I'll gladly merge this whenever you tell me I should. Please go ahead :) Cheers, -- intrigeri

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824569: gap-ctbllib: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-05-17 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Source: gap-ctbllib Version: 1r2p2.dfsg.0-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824567: tkdesk: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-05-17 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Source: tkdesk Version: 2.0-9.2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch upstream User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Tails-dev] tails binary and source packages lists URL has changed…

2016-05-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi intrigeri, On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 01:16:28PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > The ISO build from our feature/stretch branch, that generates these > files, has been broken for a while, and after some weeks our Jenkins > set up deletes artifacts it considers to be obsolete… so these files > have

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Tails-dev] tails binary and source packages lists URL has changed…

2016-05-17 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Holger Levsen wrote (11 May 2016 10:22:11 GMT) : > once again these two URLs have changed: > http://nightly.tails.boum.org/build_Tails_ISO_feature-stretch/lastSuccessful/archive/latest.iso.binpkgs >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#816072: tar: Please upstream --clamp-mtime option

2016-05-17 Thread Steven Chamberlain
tags 816072 + fixed-upstream thanks tar 1.29 is released today with this feature \o/ Please consider packaging it so that dpkg can fix #759886 Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature