Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:48:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#850502: fixed in diffoscope 68
has caused the Debian Bug report #850502,
regarding diffoscope: apk output is missing zipinfo information
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:48:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#849395: fixed in diffoscope 68
has caused the Debian Bug report #849395,
regarding diffoscope: add image metadata comparison
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:48:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#850485: fixed in diffoscope 68
has caused the Debian Bug report #850485,
regarding diffoscope: fails to run on APKs if supplied via absolute paths
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:48:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#850850: fixed in diffoscope 68
has caused the Debian Bug report #850850,
regarding diffoscope: add file type (magic) information to diff output
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:48:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#850730: fixed in diffoscope 68
has caused the Debian Bug report #850730,
regarding diffoscope: ImageFile can't deal with .ico even if it claims so
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:48:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#850807: fixed in diffoscope 68
has caused the Debian Bug report #850807,
regarding diffoscope: FileExistsError in
comparators.elf._install_debug_symbols()
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:48:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#850501: fixed in diffoscope 68
has caused the Debian Bug report #850501,
regarding diffoscope: apktool.yml file created by apktool is shown as file from
APK & contain input filenames
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:48:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#850807: fixed in diffoscope 68
has caused the Debian Bug report #850807,
regarding diffoscope: FileExistsError in
comparators.elf._install_debug_symbols()
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:48:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#850055: fixed in diffoscope 68
has caused the Debian Bug report #850055,
regarding diffoscope: Comparing a device with a regular file fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:24:22 +1100
Source: diffoscope
Binary: diffoscope
Architecture: source
Version: 68
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks
Changed-By: Chris Lamb
Description:
diffoscope_68_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
diffoscope_68.dsc
diffoscope_68.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproduc
Version: 67
Hi.
After building this version on stretch today 201 times, with different
autobuilders, the result was 200 successful builds and one sbuild hang.
Compared to the previous 10% failure rate, the sbuild hang is most
likely a completely different issue, so I hereby declare this bug as
"
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 847805 reprotest/0.4
Bug #847805 [reprotest] reprotest: document/support simple reproducibility test
with sbuild
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #847805 to the same values
previously set
> reopen 847805
Bug #847805 [repr
FYI: The status of the diffoscope source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 66
Current version: 67
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later
Control: reopen -1
Hi Alastair!
I don't think you wanted to close this bug (a bug in src:reprotest)
with your openmpi upload! :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #847805 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [reprotest]
reprotest: document/support simple reproducibility test with sbuild
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jan 2017 15:06:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#847805: fixed in openmpi 2.0.2~git.20161225-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #847805,
regarding reprotest: document/support simple reproducibility test with sbuild
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Control: tags -1 + patch
This patch fixes things for *most* cases:
--- /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gbp/scripts/buildpackage.py
+++ /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gbp/scripts/buildpackage.py
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@
upstream_tree))
gbp.log.d
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 12:54:17 +0100
Source: diffoscope
Binary: diffoscope
Architecture: source all
Version: 67~bpo8+1
Distribution: jessie-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks
Changed-By: Mattia
diffoscope_67~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
diffoscope_67~bpo8+1.dsc
diffoscope_67~bpo8+1.tar.xz
diffoscope_67~bpo8+1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
_
20 matches
Mail list logo
