Package: diffoscope
Version: 88
Severity: normal
Control: found -1 78
Hi,
when comparing the two attached .deb files with diffoscope, it doesn't
show any differences inside the control.data.xz, despite it shows a
different size of the two control.data.xz members:
--- ../aptitude-robot_1.5.2-1_al
Processing control commands:
> found -1 78
Bug #881937 [diffoscope] diffoscope: Doesn't show differences in .deb's
control.tar.xz (regression?)
Marked as found in versions diffoscope/78.
--
881937: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881937
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...
On jueves, 16 de noviembre de 2017 13:22:00 -03 Ximin Luo wrote:
[snip]
> I pointed to the various C standards documents, as well as documentation
> from multiple compilers, stating that __FILE__ is the "name of the source
> file" and in no way guarantees that the expansion can later be re-used as
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
> By the way: is there a macro or combination of macros which *default* value
> can be replaced in the use of __FILE__ without caussing regressions?
>
> Because if that's the case it's easier to convince upstream people that
> changing the usage goes in favor
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
> [..]
>
> Yes, we do understand that your workaround solves the issue, but we do also
> understand that we should not be using this workaround in the first place.
>
> Guillem: the thread is long, but be sure that we Qt/KDE maintainers consider
> that this c
By the way: is there a macro or combination of macros which *default* value
can be replaced in the use of __FILE__ without caussing regressions?
Because if that's the case it's easier to convince upstream people that
changing the usage goes in favor of reproducibility without using strange up-
t
Explicitely CCing Guillem for this one.
On miércoles, 15 de noviembre de 2017 23:01:00 -03 Ximin Luo wrote:
[sip]
> The GCC patch (neither the previous nor the planned version) does not change
> the default behaviour of __FILE__, and was never intended to. Instead, it
> gives users the ability to
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:06:00AM +, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Ping, are you ready? I don't see any commits from you in the log...
not yet & on a very bad internet connection atm.
i will publish 133 once it's ready.
thanks.
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Holger Levsen:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:34:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> This week's blog post draft is now available for review:
>> https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/drafts/133/
> [...]
>> I'll wait at least 24 hours from the time of this email for any comments,
>> and if everyth
