Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#803482: ncurses: please make the build reproducible, take two

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: > Certainly aclocal.m4 is _not_ a generated file in ncurses, Not in the Debian package, but upstream must be generating it from configure.in by running aclocal. > Possible > solutions are to run dh_strip_nondeterminism on

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#803482: ncurses: please make the build reproducible, take two

On 2015-10-31 10:48 +0100, Esa Peuha wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: >> Certainly aclocal.m4 is _not_ a generated file in ncurses, > > Not in the Debian package, but upstream must be generating it from > configure.in by running aclocal. I don't

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#803482: ncurses: please make the build reproducible, take two

On 2015-10-30 14:32 +0100, Esa Peuha wrote: > While ncurses 6.0+20151017-1 fixed the earlier reproducibility bug > #801864, it also introduced a reproducibility regression; now all the > lib*_g.a files in the lib*-dbg packages are affected by the umask, > uid/gid and build time of the build

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#803482: ncurses: please make the build reproducible, take two

Source: ncurses Version: 6.0+20151024-1 Severity: wishlist User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While ncurses 6.0+20151017-1 fixed the earlier reproducibility bug #801864, it also introduced a reproducibility regression;