Re: [Reproducible-builds] enable build path variation when testing unstable & experimental?

2016-08-19 Thread HW42
Chris Lamb: > Holger wrote: > >> I think regarding Debian releases, I'd recommend that we aim for >> partially reproducible packages given known build paths > > I agree. We should, regrettably, define a fixed build path for stretch > at this point in the release cycle. I want to note that this

Re: [Reproducible-builds] enable build path variation when testing unstable & experimental?

2016-08-19 Thread Chris Lamb
Holger wrote: > I think regarding Debian releases, I'd recommend that we aim for > partially reproducible packages given known build paths I agree. We should, regrettably, define a fixed build path for stretch at this point in the release cycle. I do not believe we would have enough resources

[Reproducible-builds] enable build path variation when testing unstable & experimental?

2016-08-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, so, the question is simple: shall we enable build path variation for unstable and experimental for all tested archs now? and disable it again for testing/i386 (and the other testing archs), so that we can show how a ~90% reproducible stretch could be achieved, while we would see in unstable