Bug#814057: diffoscope: Add option to ignore mtimes

2017-02-25 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Leo, First, thanks for getting back to us :) > Now, it would be nice if diffoscope had an option to report these > differences :) Sure. I think the best way forward would be to file a fresh, new wishlist bug expressing exactly what you currently see, and what you would like to see instead.

Bug#814057: diffoscope: Add option to ignore mtimes

2017-02-23 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 10:24:58PM +1300, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Leo, > > > Since I am comparing the entire output of Python 2.7's build process, > > there are a lot of files, and they *all* have different ctimes (we set > > mtimes to epoch). > > So, we already ignore mtimes on specified

Bug#814057: diffoscope: Add option to ignore mtimes

2017-02-23 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > So, we already ignore mtimes on specified command-line arguments: Friendly ping on this :) (See for more context) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org /

Bug#814057: diffoscope: Add option to ignore mtimes

2017-02-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Leo, > Since I am comparing the entire output of Python 2.7's build process, > there are a lot of files, and they *all* have different ctimes (we set > mtimes to epoch). So, we already ignore mtimes on specified command-line arguments: $ touch --date="@0" epoch $ touch now