Re: LeMaker HiKey960 boards arrived (was: Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network)

2017-06-13 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 01:18:27AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Long story short: 14 months passed and we didn't get any LeMaker Cello > boards (http://www.96boards.org/product/cello/). But around pentecost > we got a mail that we will get LeMaker HiKey960 boards > (http://www.96boards.org/product/

LeMaker HiKey960 boards arrived (was: Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network)

2017-06-12 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Holger Levsen wrote on 24 Mar 2016: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:40:09PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > There's about US$1200 left. > > > > To follow through with number of boards in the original proposal, I > > should probably get at least 3-4 more boards... or should we branch out > >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network

2017-01-26 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Holger Levsen [2016-12-06 17:43]: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > I heard from a Linaro contact that LeMaker wasn't able to fix the PCIE > > issue and was going to produce the board without, but that update is > > from October and there has been nothing si

Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network

2016-12-10 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Axel, On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:05:32PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > Not that I want to undermine Martin's efforts, but I wonder if we > should start by taking some more boards into account for arm64, too: we actually have arm64 hardware available now, 8 machines with octocores and 64 gb ram,

Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network

2016-12-08 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2016-12-06, Axel Beckert wrote: > Holger Levsen wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >> > I heard from a Linaro contact that LeMaker wasn't able to fix the PCIE >> > issue and was going to produce the board without, but that update is >> > from October and

Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network

2016-12-06 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > I heard from a Linaro contact that LeMaker wasn't able to fix the PCIE > > issue and was going to produce the board without, but that update is > > from October and there has been nothing since. :( […]

Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network

2016-12-06 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Martin, On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:24:50AM -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I heard from a Linaro contact that LeMaker wasn't able to fix the PCIE > issue and was going to produce the board without, but that update is > from October and there has been nothing since. :( ouch & thanks for keepin

Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network

2016-12-06 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr [2016-09-02 14:59]: > * Martin Michlmayr [2016-05-25 11:51]: > > The LeMaker Cello web site still says "shipping in Q2". I'll let you > > know when that changes. > > LeMaker sent out an update a few weeks ago saying that there is some > PCIE problem they are still debugging b

Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network

2016-09-03 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:59:54PM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > LeMaker sent out an update a few weeks ago saying that there is some > PCIE problem they are still debugging before mass production can > start. thanks for the update, Martin! Still looking forward to use those boards! :-) -- c

Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network

2016-09-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr [2016-05-25 11:51]: > The LeMaker Cello web site still says "shipping in Q2". I'll let you > know when that changes. LeMaker sent out an update a few weeks ago saying that there is some PCIE problem they are still debugging before mass production can start. -- Martin Michlma

Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network

2016-05-28 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Martin, On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:51:45AM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Right. We (HPE) placed an order for some boards and they will be > shipped to ETH Zurich. It's 4 Cello boards for reproducible builds > and some more boards for other use cases (maybe ci.debian.net). looking much for

Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network

2016-05-25 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Holger Levsen [2016-03-23 22:02]: > tbm will give us something like 4 cello boards (iirc), but it will take some > months as they are only scheduled in the 2nd quarter of 2016. These are > to be hosted at Xtaran. Right. We (HPE) placed an order for some boards and they will be shipped to ETH Z

Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network

2016-03-25 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, I'm curious if anyone has tried using a network filesystem in this kind of setup. I would think, "diskless" boards sharing a NAS allows for easier provisioning and probably cheaper storage by centralising it. Though I don't know how that performs in practice? Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain

Re: [Reproducible-builds] arm64 reproducible build network

2016-03-23 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:40:09PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > There's about US$1200 left. > > To follow through with number of boards in the original proposal, I > should probably get at least 3-4 more boards... or should we branch out > into an arm64 network with the remaining funds?