On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 08:18:18PM -0700, Mike Kupfer wrote:
dep One of the problems is that we have no good way to measure the
dep quality of their mentoring.
I think the idea was to treat the level-3 folks as interns, similar to
the way new ARC members are brought on board.
It's
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:30:00PM -0600, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
So I think we have cycled back to where we started and where we
currently are: two tiers of sponsors with requirements for both tiers.
If we leave the current program alone and don't open it up, how do we
address the problem of
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:33:29PM -0600, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
I believe engineers interested in this work will be interested in
building relationships with external developers. And therefore will do
their best to represent Sun and explain engineering practices.
With this proposal, we will
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:10:15PM -0600, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
Depending on how things go (which is hard to project at this point), it
might not be an issue. If we get a manageable number of third-tier
sponsors who do a good job, we shouldn't have a problem.
How exactly do you determine if
On Fri 21 Oct 2005 at 02:17PM, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
What's the minimum qualification for membership in tier 3?
There is no minimum qualification which is the reason for the partner
requirement.
I don't agree with this structure, then. I think that at a minimum,
one should be
