>> My personal stance on this one is that it'd be a good idea to report the
>> mountpoint instead of the device major/minor. What did you have in mind ?
>
>Here's what I was thinking:
>
>--- a/usr/src/uts/common/os/exec.c Mon Oct 08 20:24:50 2007 -0700
>+++ b/usr/src/uts/common/os/exec.c
On Jan 28, 2008 6:11 AM, wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jason King wrote:
>
>
> > I'm going to try again...
> >
> > I'd like to request a sponsor for 6613349
> > My contributor # is 0137
>
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> has anyone offered to sponsor you on that one yet ?
Not yet
>
> If not I'd be willing to
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jason King wrote:
>I'm going to try again...
>
>I'd like to request a sponsor for 6613349
Jason, I guess many people just ignore bugs for which no synopsis
was provided. It's quite tiring to look up every such bug that goes through
this alias when it's so easy to pu
My bad.. I've edited the topic I will remember to include that in
future requests..
On Jan 26, 2008 11:59 AM, Jan Pechanec wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jason King wrote:
>
> >I'm going to try again...
> >
> >I'd like to request a sponsor for 6613349
>
> Jason, I guess many people just ig
I'm going to try again...
I'd like to request a sponsor for 6613349
My contributor # is 0137
I'd like to get a sponsor for 6613349 -- setuid not allowed message
could be more useful.
