Hi, there,
I integrate resin with apache. My resin's version is 3.0.19 and apache is
2.0.59. I configured both of them to record the response time in
microseconds(log format %D).
But I found the time recorded by resin is much larger than apache. Sometimes
it's hundreds of times larger.
Does anyo
long wang wrote:
> Hi, there,
>
> I integrate resin with apache. My resin's version is 3.0.19 and apache
> is 2.0.59. I configured both of them to record the response time in
> microseconds(log format %D).
>
> But I found the time recorded by resin is much larger than apache.
> Sometimes it's hu
I don't understand why people still put their container behind apache.
Unless you are using mod_rewrite or something like that, you don't need to
do that. It isn't like apache somehow 'protects' resin from evil doers. If
you need a load balancer, get a load balancer.
jon
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2
Hi Jon & Scott,
I don't like apache either but resin 4.0.2 cluster web-tier seems
unstable for me.
I've not tested the 4.0.3 cluster.
My Apache config:
ResinHost 192.168.1.4 6801
ResinBackup 192.168.1.5 6801
Which load balancer will be more appropriate for this usage?
Thanks.
-Wesley
__
It depends on what your services, performance, and bandwidth requirements are.
Anyway, there are (a few) options.
ldirectord - (low level) http://linux.die.net/man/8/ldirectord
balance -- (low level) http://www.inlab.de/balance.html
trafficmanager -- (yahoo lb turned open-source)
http://incubator.
Also, my point in mentioning an LB is that it should be done at the network
level so as to not incur the same overhead of a reverse proxy like Apache
(which is why this email started in the first place). At work we have zxtm
connecting to jboss/tomcat which does well enough. Obviously if you are
us
Jon Stevens wrote:
> Also, my point in mentioning an LB is that it should be done at the
> network level so as to not incur the same overhead of a reverse proxy
> like Apache (which is why this email started in the first place). At
> work we have zxtm connecting to jboss/tomcat which does well e
Hi, Scott,
Thanks for your reply.
Could you give me some hints about the 3rd-party tool? I want to record the
exact time. The time should be accurate to about 1ms at least.
Regards
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> long wang wrote:
> > Hi, there,
> >
> > I integrate re
