ditto! USERS RULE! plug-in encryption modules, hiphip!
- ilyes
Original Message
From: Eric Ullman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption protection
To: retro-talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The *right* way to implement this is to let
Subject: Re: The "FINDER.DAT" bug with Retro 4.3
From: "Robin Mayoff" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:09:36 -0800
snip
If you choose to delete the finder.dat file, then you can not return the
file to a Macintosh without losing Mac specific properties.
So, if these files are to
Yes, that is correct. Windows does not require those files, only the
Macintosh.
Robin
From: Steve Maser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:25:57 -0500
To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The "FINDER.DAT" bug with Retro 4.3
Hello,
Trying to backup a remote volume of +/- 70 gb (ASIP server) on a raid disk
(soft raid), I got those errors:
Can't save Snapshot in Backup Set A, error -25051 (file backup set
catalog limited to 16 MB)
Catalog pre-flight failed, error -25051 (file backup set catalog
limited
Title: Re: Encryption protection
I understand from the replies here that SimpleCrypt isn't secure,
at least in the sense that with enough time the encryption scheme can
be defeated. That's true for any scheme if you have infinite amounts
of time and computers.
What I'd like to know is a
on 2/28/01 11:30 AM, "Todd Reed" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand from the replies here that SimpleCrypt isn't secure, at least in
the sense that with enough time the encryption scheme can be defeated. That's
true for any scheme if you have infinite amounts of time and computers.
What
on 2/28/01 4:51 PM, "Adam Cohen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sorry if this is not the correct forum to let users know but since we
talk about backup it seemed that this drive could help someone in the field.
It is perfectly acceptable to offer hardware and software for sale on this
list.
