Re: Question about AD integration and users/groups

Glad e-mail is working! Is it literally /logs? Whatever directory you specify must exist and be writable by the web server. It will also likely take a server restart for logging to kick in. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware,

Re: Testers wanted for new SSH/HTTPS repository support

Hi Christian, thanks for the feedback! I guess, RB 1.1a identifying itself as Review Board 1.0.3 is a clear indication that the combined setup doesn't work, correct? You may be able to tell Apache which version to use by prepending the path to the particular Review Board .egg directory

Comment type/severity

Hi All, I would like to urge you to view this enhancement suggestion and participate in the discussion. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1277 I feel having a comment type/severity would greatly enhance the usability of RB at mature software development copmanies while it

Re: Question about AD integration and users/groups

On Oct 16, 2009, at 3:55, Christian Hammond wrote: Is it literally /logs? Whatever directory you specify must exist and be writable by the web server. It will also likely take a server restart for logging to kick in. Well, the rb-site script created a logs directory at the same level

rb is super slow after upgrade to 1.0.4

Hey guys, The short story is that we're experiencing a huge increase in load on apache after we upgraded from 1.0.3 to 1.0.4. The long story is this: We had rb 1.0.3 on a dual core xeon 2.8ghz with 1GB of ram running linux 64-bit. The software setup is like this: apache-2.2.11, memcached-1.3.3,

Re: rb is super slow after upgrade to 1.0.4

Hi, This absolutely shouldn't happen. The last-update code is only on our master branch for 1.1 alpha. I just checked the code and last-update doesn't occur in there at all. Was there ever an install of any part of 1.1 on that system? Anything from the master branch in git? I haven't heard this

Re: Question about AD integration and users/groups

It's an absolute path, and needs to be specified. The 1.1 release will actually check that you've specified a valid, writable path. The 1.0.x releases just don't do the validation. I'm also planning to set it to the right log directory by default, and probably turn on logging by default.

Issue 1277 in reviewboard: Comment Types

Comment #4 on issue 1277 by vi...@djgraphite.com: Comment Types http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1277 I think that while this is a good idea in spirit, I'm not sure it would work in practice. I don't think severity is useful in the case of code reviews in the same way

Issue 1357 in reviewboard: XMPP chat notification of request changes

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 1357 by gic...@gmail.com: XMPP chat notification of request changes http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1357 Is there a general notification API one can implement to observe changes in review

Issue 1357 in reviewboard: XMPP chat notification of request changes

Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 488 Comment #1 on issue 1357 by trowbrds: XMPP chat notification of request changes http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1357 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed

Issue 488 in reviewboard: Instant messaging integration

Comment #4 on issue 488 by trowbrds: Instant messaging integration http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=488 Issue 1357 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this