Re: Review Board 1.7.4 released

2013-02-01 Thread victoria
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that in BitNami we have already released installers, vms and cloud images for ReviewBoard 1.7.4. You can get them in http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard Best regards, Victoria. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: > Ah, okay. Well you defi

Re: Review Board 1.7.4 released

2013-02-01 Thread Christian Hammond
Great! Thanks Victoria :) We'll work out something at some point to link to your builds for Windows users in the docs and site. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 1, 2013, at 12:22 AM, vic

Re: Review Board 1.7.4 released

2013-02-01 Thread victoria
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: > Great! Thanks Victoria :) > > We'll work out something at some point to link to your builds for Windows > users in the docs and site. > Hey! Thanks but we are still working on Windows :) I plan to send you a beta build today or on Monday

Re: Review Board 1.7.4 released

2013-02-01 Thread Christian Hammond
On Feb 1, 2013, at 12:34 AM, victoria wrote: > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: >> Great! Thanks Victoria :) >> >> We'll work out something at some point to link to your builds for Windows >> users in the docs and site. >> > > Hey! Thanks but we are still working on

Re: GitHub private repo with RB

2013-02-01 Thread Igor Kryltsov
Google fucked up all attached images. Sorry. All was attached properly. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe f

Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4

2013-02-01 Thread chuck j
Thanks Christian for the response. Good to hear that upgrade is possible from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 RB version, apart from the database backup do we need to take care of any thing else which will disturb our production setup and in case of any issue we should be able to go back to our original state, if

Re: GitHub private repo with RB

2013-02-01 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Igor, I don't know what you'd need the WebHook for. Sounds like you're set up to use Review Board with GitHub. We don't work with pull requests, if that's what you're asking. We don't have support on our side, and even if we want to add them, there's a challenge in figuring out how username as

Re: a couple of issues post 1.7.1 upgrade

2013-02-01 Thread Loke Dupont
I am also seeing this issue. Did you ever find a solution for this? - Loke On Monday, January 7, 2013 5:46:49 PM UTC+1, Dave Preston wrote: > > Ok I’ll give that a shot and report back. Thanks again Christian. > > > > Dave > > > > *From:* revie...@googlegroups.com [mailto: > revie...@googleg

Re: a couple of issues post 1.7.1 upgrade

2013-02-01 Thread Christian Hammond
That's concerning. I've spent a lot of time trying to test some of the Subversion cases that were reported, but I haven't hit the problems that were reported, and that code really hasn't changed in any significant ways since 1.6.14... Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review B

Re: GitHub private repo with RB

2013-02-01 Thread Igor Kryltsov
Hi Christian, We already use RB with SVN for a few years. It is in post commit mode. So there is SVN hook which tells RB about commit, RB pulls it and creates reviews. On pictures attached, I think, I configured RB to be able to pull but what will tell RB about GitHub commit if not a web hook s