Even with this checkbox checked, the state of "Public Read-only access" is
always disabled. If I look at the site configuration in the admin
database :Change site Configuration" page, settings has
u'auth_require_sitewide_login': False in it. I poked around in the code
and auth_anonymous_acce
Hi there,
I'm an avid Review Board user, and I have a small question:
Is there a way to selectively disable e-mail notification for changes
to a review?
Sometimes I make small editorial changes to review data, and I don't
feel I need to spam a review group (sometimes 20-30 people) with the
detai
Hello,
I have the following problem installing reviewboard via easy_install3
(installed via apt-get install python3-setuptools). is there a problem with
my setup tools or is there really an invalid syntax inside the settings.py?
the piece of code in the underneath mentioned file is:
# Load lo
Review Board does not support Python 3. You'll need to use Python 2.x
-David
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Alexander Mayr
wrote:
> Hello,
> I have the following problem installing reviewboard via easy_install3
> (installed via apt-get install python3-setuptools). is there a problem with
>
Hi Kim,
This feature doesn't exist, though it does come up from time to time. If
done right, I'd be okay taking a patch for it, but our plate's pretty full
right now trying to get RB 2.0 ready to ship.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.or
Hi Jeff,
I've just tried this on our installation, and it's working fine here. 1.7.9
is a bit older now, though I'm not aware of this feature having been broken
at any point.
Can you tell me the repro case? If you're logged out, you're unable to
access /r/ ?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - ch
On 2013-10-17 15:31, Christian Hammond wrote:
[...] our plate's pretty full right now trying to get RB 2.0 ready to
ship.
Wait... what happened to 1.8? :-)
If you're really planning a major version bump (i.e. that wasn't a
typo), is there a page somewhere with at least a brief overview of
wh
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
> On 2013-10-17 15:31, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>> [...] our plate's pretty full right now trying to get RB 2.0 ready to
>> ship.
>>
>
> Wait... what happened to 1.8? :-)
>
> If you're really planning a major version bump (i.e. that wasn
Hi Christian,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> This feature doesn't exist, though it does come up from time to time. If
> done right, I'd be okay taking a patch for it, but our plate's pretty full
> right now trying to get RB 2.0 ready to ship.
Good to hear!
I might
