Hi,
Can you show me one of the URLs it’s trying to load (say, a CSS file)?
Also, two things to check:
1) Make sure you have the following in your $sitedir/conf/settings_local.py
DEBUG = False
2) Run this and look at the paths that are set. Make sure they are what you
expect:
rb-site m
Update list of Python Packages:
PackageVersion
-- ---
asana 0.8.2
asn1crypto 0.24.0
backports.shutil-get-terminal-size 1.0.0
bcrypt
Hi, I've been trying to install ReviewBoard on a RedHat Server for the last
couple of days, and I can't seem to make it work.
I was able to install it and the apache & mysqld servers are running, but
the only page I'm able to get is a 500 Internal Server error page.
I've looked into the logs,
Yes all present and correct.
On Wednesday, 26 June 2019 16:39:44 UTC+1, Paul Mansfield wrote:
>
> check you have the following mappings in your apache config for reviewboard
>
> # Alias static media requests to filesystem
> Alias /media "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media"
> Alias /static "/var/
check you have the following mappings in your apache config for reviewboard
# Alias static media requests to filesystem
Alias /media "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media"
Alias /static "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/static"
Alias /errordocs "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/errordocs"
Alias /favicon.ico
"
Hi,
I'm new to Reviewboard but managed to find my way around through an upgrade
from 1.6.. to 3.0. whilst changing from Mod_Python to WSGI. Also upgraded
from Ubuntu 12.04 to 18.06 and there seemed to be a few dependency issues
to sort out on the way.
Anyway Reviewboard seems to working now a
Paul, Christian,
Thanks very much for giving the useful insight. I will look forward to
these enhancements.
Koushik
On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 7:29:57 AM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> This for now is the way to do it. There are technical reasons why we need
> one repository entry
Hi Ron,
There’s no setting or anything to change this text. You’d have to patch the
code itself, which I don’t recommend. Changing it would just add to
confusion, as the terminology is used in various places in the UI, e-mails,
command line tools, API, webhooks, and documentation. “Ship It” is als
Hi,
Yes, Review Board works fine behind a load balancer. We do this ourselves
for the servers we run (including our SaaS, RBCommons.com). It’s important
that you use the same site directory contents across both. NFS works for
this, but be mindful of performance (it’s likely going to be much slower
This for now is the way to do it. There are technical reasons why we need
one repository entry per actual repository, and there’s just no way to have
a single entry act as a proxy for multiple ones.
Once we wrap up RB4 (soon! Finishing the last big project in it), we’re
aiming to redo repository c
Thanks Paul, will you or somebody be able to comment on my first question
that is,
Does reviewboard supports High availability (HA) support capability like
putting the installation behind the load balancer that can distribute the
load between more than one machine?
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 3:45 PM P
Provided your NFS storage is reliable and highly responsive, I don't see
why you shouldn't put the service and the backing database onto an NFS
store.
Still, personally, I'd put it onto the fastest storage which is usually
local virtual disk, and then ensure that I had good replication of the
yes, that worked. the UI in Chrome for controlling HSTS is quite primitive,
but did allow me to enter each domain in turn and delete from the cache.
On Friday, 14 June 2019 11:17:55 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, you might have to clear
> reviewboard.org/demo.reviewboard.org
I'd use the gitlab API to get a list of repositories
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/repositories.html
and get a list of repositories in RB and compare and create as required
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/3.0/webapi/2.0/resources/repository-list/
--
Supercharge your Review Board with P
Ensure the wsgi module is installed and loaded into your web server. In
apache on centos, I have the following installed:
mod_wsgi-3.4-18.el7.x86_64
uwsgi-plugin-common-2.0.17.1-2.el7.x86_64
uwsgi-2.0.17.1-2.el7.x86_64
uwsgi-plugin-python2-2.0.17.1-2.el7.x86_64
mod_proxy_uwsgi-2.0.17.1-2.el7.x86_
Hello,
Can someone please respond to my queries? Usually, what is the response
time please as I had put my queries on this forum on June 21, 2019 at
4:02:02 PM UTC+5:30
Thanks,
Gautam.
On Friday, June 21, 2019 at 4:02:02 PM UTC+5:30, Gautam Bajaj wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are evaluating for upgrad
16 matches
Mail list logo
