Hi Christian.
Sounds promising! I'll check that later on. Thanks!
Cheers
Veit
Gesendet: Dienstag, 02. Februar 2016 um 00:01 Uhr
Von: "Christian Hammond"
An: "reviewboard@googlegroups.com"
Betreff: Re: GitHub-style review flow
Hi Veit,
As far as I can tell,
'm quite sure, that this also happened with the account the
> >> review requests belong to.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Veit
> >>
> >> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 18. Dezember 2015 um 00:36 Uhr
> >> *Von:* "Christian Hammond"
> >> *An:*
published.
>> But I'm quite sure, that this also happened with the account the
>> review requests belong to.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Veit
>>
>> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 18. Dezember 2015 um 00:36 Uhr
>> *Von:* "Christian Hammond"
>>
.
> But I'm quite sure, that this also happened with the account the
> review requests belong to.
>
> Cheers
> Veit
>
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 18. Dezember 2015 um 00:36 Uhr
> *Von:* "Christian Hammond"
> *An:* "reviewboard@googlegroups.com"
>
um 00:36 Uhr
Von: "Christian Hammond"
An: "reviewboard@googlegroups.com"
Betreff: Re: GitHub-style review flow
Hi Veit,
That definitely seems wrong. These are published review requests, not drafts?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc
Hi Veit,
That definitely seems wrong. These are published review requests, not
drafts?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Veit Guna wrote:
> Hi Christ
Hi Christian.
I've applied your patch to my rbt and it seems to work, thanks for that :)!
But looking at /review-requests/ shows the requests, but the attributes
"branch" and "bugs" are always
empty, although these attributes are set on the request. I also changed
to values through the UI, but wi
Wow, thanks Christian - that was quick :)!
I'll take a look at the github hook. Thanks!
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2015 um 11:47 Uhr
Von: "Christian Hammond"
An: "reviewboard@googlegroups.com"
Betreff: Re: GitHub-style review flow
Just for you, Veit: https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/7812/
I know this isn't a full answer to everything in your e-mail (it's nearly
3AM and I'm about to crash), but this should let you at least use api-get
without a local checkout by passing --server=.
To answer your last question, the old-styl
Hi.
In a project we're using subversion as our SCM. Since I like the GitHub
review style very much, I would like to do the same with reviewboard.
For this the planned process would look like the following:
- The "master" branch is trunk
- All code changes are done within separate feature branche
10 matches
Mail list logo