We have previously been using WinDiff (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WinDiff_demonstration.png for
example of output) and I have had several folk asking if there are
alternatives to the side-by-side approach taken by ReviewBoard -
specifically the format used by WinDiff.
It's not clear to
I think the short answer is no, but the masters of RB should chime in.
The reason being the view and diff technology are unique to RB.
-Noah
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:56 AM, James McDougall
wrote:
> We have previously been using WinDiff (see
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WinDiff_demonstra
Right, we have our own pretty specific diff viewer. It's very much a
side-by-side viewer right now and it would take a lot of work to change
that. It's not a priority given other work and not likely to happen in the
near future. Especially not before 2.0.
In theory, after 2.0 someone could write a
e release J
From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Christian Hammond
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 12:00 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Is there any flexibility to change the "diff" format for a
review?
Right, we have our o
legroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Christian Hammond
> *Sent:* Monday, March 22, 2010 12:00 PM
> *To:* reviewboard@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: Is there any flexibility to change the "diff" format for a
> review?
>
>
>
&g
diffs (and, for the most part, the RB
>> built in diff is 1239781092378912% easier to use for small changes anyways J
>> )
>>
>>
>>
>> Dana Lacoste
>>
>>
>>
>> PS: I know that “download the full file” is a feature on the backlog for
>>
imply download the full file, and then users
> could
> >> use any tool they desire to view the diffs (and, for the most part, the
> RB
> >> built in diff is 1239781092378912% easier to use for small changes
> anyways J
> >> )
> >>
> >>
> >>
t; >> use any tool they desire to view the diffs (and, for the most part, the
> > RB
> > >> built in diff is 1239781092378912% easier to use for small changes
> > anyways J
> > >> )
>
> > >> Dana Lacoste
>
> > >> PS: I know that “down
