Re: Testers wanted for new SSH/HTTPS repository support

2009-10-16 Thread Clemens Ballarin
Hi Christian, thanks for the feedback! I guess, RB 1.1a identifying itself as "Review Board 1.0.3" is a clear indication that the combined setup doesn't work, correct? > You may be able to tell Apache which version to use by prepending > the path to the particular Review Board .egg direct

Re: Testers wanted for new SSH/HTTPS repository support

2009-10-15 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Clemens, While it's probably possible to have two versions co-exist, I've never tried and I don't know how much I'd recommend it. rb-site is always going to update the site to the latest installed version, which will cause problems for you. You may be able to tell Apache which version to use b

Re: Testers wanted for new SSH/HTTPS repository support

2009-10-15 Thread Clemens Ballarin
Hi Christian, we've installed RB from the Git repository this morning. What we are trying to do is to run two versions of RB on the same machine, RB 1.0.3 and RB 1.1a, sharing user and web server, but on two different instances of the Python interpreter. I suspect that this doesn't actual

Testers wanted for new SSH/HTTPS repository support

2009-10-05 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi everyone, One of the biggest problems we've noticed from new users is that various repositories require SSH or HTTPS (in the case of Subversion) access, and that we had no support for this, requiring instead that users set up a dedicated read-only HTTP repository. Tonight I've committed code t