Re: Issue 2856 in reviewboard: Error in accessing the review link

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 2856 by trowb...@gmail.com: Error in accessing the review link http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2856 You need to fill out the form. If you're able to provide the requested information, please add a comment and we'll r

Issue 2856 in reviewboard: Error in accessing the review link

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2856 by manjula.gupta13...@gmail.com: Error in accessing the review link http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2856 * NOTE: For customer support, please post to * * reviewbo...@goog

Issue 2855 in reviewboard: Clicking into an issue on the summary doesn't focus on the issue

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2855 by brunon...@brunonery.com: Clicking into an issue on the summary doesn't focus on the issue http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2855 What version are you running? 1.7.1 What's the URL of the page co

Re: Issue 2238 in reviewboard: unicode error in postreview

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #5 on issue 2238 by trowb...@gmail.com: unicode error in postreview http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2238 Pushed the fix to rbtools master (7b53c05). Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2820 in reviewboard: bitnami-review-board upload .diff file, show 'broken files'

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Incomplete Comment #2 on issue 2820 by trowb...@gmail.com: bitnami-review-board upload .diff file, show 'broken files' http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2820 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are su

Re: Issue 2854 in reviewboard: Reviewer should be able to close issues

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 2713 Comment #1 on issue 2854 by trowb...@gmail.com: Reviewer should be able to close issues http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2854 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you ar

Re: Issue 2713 in reviewboard: Reviewer, not author, should mark issues as resolved/reopened

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 2713 by trowb...@gmail.com: Reviewer, not author, should mark issues as resolved/reopened http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2713 Issue 2854 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "

Re: Issue 2853 in reviewboard: Reviewer should be able to reopen issues

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 2713 Comment #1 on issue 2853 by trowb...@gmail.com: Reviewer should be able to reopen issues http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2853 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you a

Re: Issue 2713 in reviewboard: Reviewer, not author, should mark issues as resolved/reopened

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 2713 by trowb...@gmail.com: Reviewer, not author, should mark issues as resolved/reopened http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2713 Issue 2853 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "

Re: Issue 2713 in reviewboard: Reviewer, not author, should mark issues as resolved/reopened

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Summary: Reviewer, not author, should mark issues as resolved/reopened Comment #2 on issue 2713 by trowb...@gmail.com: Reviewer, not author, should mark issues as resolved/reopened http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2713 (No comment was entered for this cha

Issue 2854 in reviewboard: Reviewer should be able to close issues

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 2854 by brunon...@brunonery.com: Reviewer should be able to close issues http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2854 What version are you running? 1.7.1 What's the URL of the page this enhancement relat

Issue 2853 in reviewboard: Reviewer should be able to reopen issues

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 2853 by brunon...@brunonery.com: Reviewer should be able to reopen issues http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2853 What version are you running? 1.7.1 What's the URL of the page this enhancement rela

Re: Issue 2833 in reviewboard: post-review needs to override git diff.renames option

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 2833 by trowb...@gmail.com: post-review needs to override git diff.renames option http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2833 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Issue 2833 in reviewboard: post-review needs to override git diff.renames option

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 2833 by matthew@kitware.com: post-review needs to override git diff.renames option http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2833 This is fixed as of bacdab01f33; can someone with adequate permissions please close? -- You received this message because y

Re: Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to '' didn't apply cleanly.

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Comment #16 on issue 658 by trowb...@gmail.com: Error : The patch to '' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 Getting rejects usually indicates some problem with how the diff was generated. Check the .rej file to see what failed. -- You received t

Re: Issue 2851 in reviewboard: Error: The patch to 'ProcessCVSFiles.java' didn't apply cleanly

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 2851 by trowb...@gmail.com: Error: The patch to 'ProcessCVSFiles.java' didn't apply cleanly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2851 How did you create your diff? What is in those .rej files? -- You received this message

Re: Issue 489 in reviewboard: [ ] DON'T SHIP IT button

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Comment #36 on issue 489 by matthew@kitware.com: [ ] DON'T SHIP IT button http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=489 The whole 'karma' idea is fairly common... see e.g. gerrit, Fedora Bodhi, etc. Although I'm not sure that's actually necessary for RB, since we already h

Re: Issue 2723 in reviewboard: Show issue status in dashboard

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 2723 by matthew@kitware.com: Show issue status in dashboard http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2723 Just showing unresolved issues would be a significant improvement. Three column choices for unresolved, resolved, and total (or five, adding also

Issue 2852 in reviewboard: Accessibility issue with reviewboard

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2852 by kd7...@gmail.com: Accessibility issue with reviewboard http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2852 I really notice problems on the my dashboard. The control that allows you to change to admin and/or t

Issue 2851 in reviewboard: Error: The patch to 'ProcessCVSFiles.java' didn't apply cleanly

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2851 by gjun...@gmail.com: Error: The patch to 'ProcessCVSFiles.java' didn't apply cleanly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2851 * NOTE: For customer support, please post to * *

Issue 2850 in reviewboard: rb-site fails to set SELinux security context on new files

2013-01-08 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2850 by p...@talk21.com: rb-site fails to set SELinux security context on new files http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2850 What version are you running? 1.7.1 What's the URL of the page containing the